Obama had a reasonable group on the ground in all 50 states, partially because he was an organized, disciplined guy, but also because he had so damn many young volunteers that his people were hard-pressed to figure out what to do with them. Hilary also had a fairly well-organized force across the country; much more so than Gingrich or Santorum do now. Yes Obama “fought” in all states but he did pick and choose where to spend valuable campaign cash, especially early in the process.

Obama in 2008 focused on nickel-and-diming his way to victory: in the early months he effective ceded the states where the Democrats (and thus Clinton) already had very strong programs in place on concentrated on “red” states where the Democrats didn’t have too many people or which were traditionally under-funded by the DNC (Iowa, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Alaska). Hilary put all her money and effort into Big-Blue states like California and New York, or perceived “swing states” like Pennsylvania or Ohio where she figured she’d need the infrastructure for the “real” race.

But the “red” states still matter for the primaries… even Democratic ones. Obama got great numbers from them and reasonable numbers from the “blue” and “swing” states, while Hilary got decent numbers from the states that she concentrated on and terrible results from the “red” states. This allowed Obama to pull even halfway through and then the momentum was on his side.

What’s interesting to me is that Santorum seems to be taking a page from Obama’s playbook. The other candidates ignored the Colorado and Minnesota caucuses and effectively waved off the non-official Missouri “beauty contest”, but he spent a fair amount of time in each of them (while ignoring the more-visible Nevada primary), and he’s shown that he’s still in the race and now (sorta) has more delegates than Gingrich.

Drudge linked to the WorldNetDaily article. I was genuinely shocked that it was so relatively straightforward and pro-Obama, despite Wenzel the pollster’s disturbing inability to count.

I can only imagine they are trying to terrify their base even more, not realizing how incredibly counterproductive that seems to be.

Honestly, from a policy perspective, he’s also a Reagan era Republican anyway so they should feel good about that vote.

Oh, Santorum. You hot mess.

“They are taking faith and crushing it. Why? Why? When you marginalize faith in America, when you remove the pillar of God given rights then what’s left?” Santorum said according to radio station WLS.

“The French Revolution,” the presidential continued. "What’s left is a government that gives you rights. What’s left are no unalienable rights. What’s left is a government that will tell you who you are, what you’ll do and when you’ll do it. What’s left in France became the guillotine.

“Ladies and gentlemen, we are a long way from that, but if we do follow the path of President Obama and his overt hostility to faith in America, then we are headed down that road.”

If Obama leads a new French Revolution, he’ll start out insisting on guillotining Senate Republicans, but eventually settle for re-castrating Senate Democrats, with a tax subsidy for guillotine manufacturers and a bailout for the soiled wicker basket industry.

Maybe we could use a little bit of the early Danton, if not Robespierre before he got elected to the committee for public safety and apparently went insane with power and authority. Or is it enough to have Ron Paul :)

Does Santorum even understand that the American Revolution inspired the French Revolution?

Anyway, what has Obama done to marginalize faith? Er, I mean how is he “crushing” faith?

The American Revolution inspired the French Revolution, but from there they sort of went different directions. :)

He’s a non-white Muslim whose presence in the White House is a sign of anti-Christian cultural collapse. Everyone (who is batshit crazy like Santorum) knows that.

JESUS CHRIST HE REALLY TRULY IS MY NIGHTMARE CANDIDATE

He’s a hater of the worst kind. Geezus.

Actually, most delegates to the Republican convention are technically legally bound to vote for vote the person they represented on the ballot. Some 40-odd states have most or all of their delegates legally bound.

[LEFT]… But of course the catch is in the details. Bound delegates are not generally legally obligated to vote for their candidate if their candidate has withdrawn from the race and released the delegates. In modern times, most also-rans do just that, and ask their delegates to support the winner in the name of party unity. (The notable exception being Ron Paul, who is Proving A Point.)
[/LEFT]

Delegates also generally not legally required to support their pledged candidate past the first ballot. These days that’s moot – no presidential convention has gone to a second ballot since 1956.

As an Obama supporter he’s my dream candidate.

Santorum is the American version of Ayatollah Khomeini. I know our politics have gone a bit nuts, but I have a hard time seeing this guy getting elected.

Unless the Pentagon suddenly decides to revolt against the nation and do Gingrich’s bidding, I don’t think that would lead to anything except Gingrich being led from the White House in a white coat, screaming “Off with their heads!!! Off with their heads!!! I am the PRESIDENT and I DEMAND THEY BE ARRESTED AND EXECUTED!!! ON PRIME TIME TV!!!”

My absolute dream scenario:

Romney looks at the polls, sees that Obama is starting to creep upwards, and looks at how he can’t seem to get widespread GOP support, sees the results from this last week, and, in disgust, says “Screw the GOP. If they don’t want me, I don’t want them.”

Then he calls a press conference and says “It is clear that the Republican Party does not want to get behind me as their nominee for President, and they have made their feelings clear. Therefore, I am honoring their feelings and I am officially withdrawing my candidacy, effective immediately.”

I would absolutely love that, and Romney would leap to my Top 10 politicians list.

Romney and Gingrich (at least) were in Minnesota just before the caucuses. There wasn’t much in the way of television buys or anything, but that’s pretty normal.

He lost his re-election bid in Pennsylvania by 17 points. There’s no way he wins a national election.

I’m all tingly.

It’s a meme I’ve been hearing a lot from the Right of late and it seems to have no bearing in reality. It’s just one of those things that, if you say it enough times, people take it on, well, faith.

This betrays a misunderstanding of the fundamental nature of Romney. Romney craves the Presidency with ever fiber of his being and he will say and do anything in an attempt to get people’s support. His political desperation is one of the things that people are so turned off by.

Eh, that seems to be taking the anti-Romney portrait of Romney pretty literally. He’s certainly to-the-manner-born and thinks the Presidency needs him, the better sort of person, and all of this vote-grubbing and vision-thing flailing are means to that end.

But however inadequate he is by my metrics of political preference - pretty goddamned - the fact is the GOP have jilted him and jilted him and jilted him, and if he did what Jeff said I’d shake his hand and pat him on the back. There are Republicans and then there are Republicans.

The current crop makes me nostalgic for half of the Bushies, and I’d never have believed that possible. Santorum and his backers (Or Bachmann) are more or less fascists. That was a total bullshit label when it was applied to mainstream politicians in the 1960s and it’s kept that bullshit connotation, but aside from a paper-thin, formal commitment to something they call democracy, they’re fascists.

Nitpick
To the ‘manor’ born. As in, you grew up wealthy and privileged in a big fancy house.
/Nitpick