I can’t speak for everyone else, but for me, I thought it more likely that @Matt_W was bluffing than that @Lantz was, and I thought that based on how quickly they announced their roles (whether they took time to rule out a double claim possibility or not) and which roles they claimed. Lantz came out of the gate with middling role and offered up the information he had right away. Matt, on the other hand, first claimed he had info (which he did not disclose) and only claimed a role later when challenged, and claimed a role which came with a kind of immunity from execution. It just seemed off to me.
Was it right? Dave says so, but is he telling the truth?