I agree with Brian and Rich that both the liberal worldview and the neoconservative worldview are valid. And what Rich says is also correct, that the Democrats need to work in the grassroots level and sell that message, because right now, people who buy into the neoconservative worldview outnumber those who buy into the liberal worldview. The great progressive programs of the past (if you believe there are any) were sold to the American people. They were not presented as: “If you don’t believe we should do this, you’re a stupid fool and we’re not going to waste time with you,” which seems to be the Democrats’ current modus operandi.
If I tell you, “You believe that? You’re a moron,” then you’re not going to listen to anything I’m going to say. I’ve done as much with McCullough in this thread; do you think I’ll have any prayer of convincing him otherwise, no matter how rational my position may be? At this point he is probably so turned off to my point of view, that he wouldn’t even listen to someone else making it.
Rather, if I tell him he’s right (from a certain point of view) from the outset, he’s gonna listen as I drum up evidence for my point of view, followed my my point of view.
In short, I’m a fool for offending McCullough’s sensibilities, and he is right for feeling offended. Which makes the rest of this post moot:
There are legitimate policy-related reasons to dislike Bush. I’m sure those are the reasons you have. Those were the reasons I had for disliking Clinton in 1996. I eventually came to realize that the reason I had my political beliefs was more because I disliked Clinton than because I really believed in them; when I saw the pictures come back from the concentration camps in what used to be Yugoslavia, I could not look myself in the mirror and still claim that our involvement was a waste.
Did the elections in Iraq have poor turnout? Did they happen? Did we capture Saddam Hussein? Did we take Tikrit? Did we take Baghdad? Did we have tens of thousands of soldiers lost while Iraqi troops pushed us back several miles deep into Kuwait? If Bush meets the goal, the goalposts move. Why do the goalposts keep moving back, if they are not there merely to show that Bush is wrong?
These are insights that took me a great deal of time to acquire, so I don’t expect to convince anyone in a single pathetic message-board posting. The good news (for America) is that some of you already seem to know it. I do not care for either party; however, I find a one-party nation undesirable.
Well, it’ll be undesirable once the Social Security reform passes, but not before then.