Damn, it autocorrected me. Martial arts teacher.

Hey, don’t be dissing materials arts teachers!

So, to be clear here, you’d give him your wallet, and then wait until… what? He leaves and follow him? Shoot him in the back? I’m just trying to follow this train of thought and wrap my head around it.

You could wait until he puts his gun away, and then pull yours out to demand your wallet back.

This could go on for hours.

No problem, it still amounts to the same thing: don’t bring a karate chop to a gunfight.

Sorry, you’ll have to rely on your imagination.

Idiot brings gun into theater fearing a mass shooting.

Accidentally shoots someone.

Stupid victim should’ve been armed to protect herself, right?

No shortage of guns in this story. Good guys, bad guys, everyone had a gun. $25 dollar dispute turns into a double homicide.

http://news.yahoo.com/sheriff-gun-shop-shootout-over-25-kills-2-184127654.html

And another one. Too bad the good samaritans didn’t have guns.

http://news.yahoo.com/sheriff-man-shot-stranded-driver-stopping-help-192814700.html

Anecdotes may be useful in introducing an idea, but they’re insufficient when it comes to making a broader argument. You have to back them up with data that explains how your example represents a larger (and important) phenomenon.

Too bad the GUNS FOR EVERYONE FOREVER side made research into the subject de facto illegal!

It’s certainly quite convenient if you’re opposed to gun control.

Active shooter at San Diego Naval Medical Center.

“An active shooter has just been reported in building #26 at Naval Medical Center San Diego. All occupants are advised to run, hide or fight. All non-emergency response personnel are asked to stay away from the compound, located at 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134.”

All occupants are advised to run, hide or fight.

That seems like a strange order.

I actually really liked that line.

Keep in mind that some of the personnel there are seamen/soldiers on active duty with firearms. I’m sure the “fight” portion of the notice is meant for them more than the average retiree there getting a prescription.

But if the military personnel find themselves outgunned, they can always ask to borrow the heavy weapons that grandma is carrying.

Yeah, I just found it interesting, as I’ve never seen them give such an order to folks in that situation.

Run Hide Fight is pretty much the established doctrine for active shooter scenarios, anywhere.

It should be pointed out that there was not an active shooter here (San Diego Naval Medical Center), though. Bogus story.

Yeah, like I said, I’ve just never heard it phrases like that. From looking it up, it looks like that way of describing it was started up in 2014. And seeing that it’s meant as a sequence of options, from most preferable to least, makes sense and fits with what I had encountered with active shooter training.

The first time I read it there, in the line I quoted, it looked like they were saying, “hey, do one of these things!”

I mean… what other options are there? Eat a sandwich? Carry on as normal?

Hey! Hey! No age discrimination, now.