Just reviving this to point out that Wumpus posted this question on his blog, blasting the 50% answer.

I think his particular formulation was a better fit for the 50% answer as well. It would have clearer to have it: ‘do you have a girl?’ ‘yes.’ instead.

Feh - again the correct answer relies on interpretation of the question. He phrased the question in a muddy way, then ignored the resulting uncertainty.

His phrasing (the setup):
“Let’s say, hypothetically speaking, you met someone who told you they had two children, and one of them is a girl.”

There are at least three possible ways to interpret this statement. If I heard the above in a random conversation (not some riddle thread on QT3), I would take it to mean “one of them is a girl [and the other is a boy]”, thus implying high confidence that the second is a boy.

But then, there is the follow up question/problem:
“What are the odds that person has a boy and a girl?”

OK, now we’re talking about a goofy riddle/problem. The follow up question implies that the first interpretation is probably not correct in this (contrived) context. But it still leaves open two possibilities.

The original statement could be interpreted as (and more precisely rendered as):

“…they had two children, and AT LEAST one of them is a girl.”

in which case the odds of one girl, one boy are 2/3.

or, it could be:

“…they had two children, and one identifiable one is a girl” (the older one, say, or the one known to the speker is a girl, and the other one is unknown), in which case the odds are probably around 50/50, but in context could actually be different. i.e. If it is known that the person has an 8 year old and a 9 year old, and you meet the parent at a ballet class where the 9 year old (a girl) is enrolled, but the 8 year old is nowhere in sight, it’s a reasonable inference that the chances that the 8 year old is a boy are >50%, since if both were girls, it would be likely that they would both be in the ballet class or at least the other one would be hanging around while the other is in class.

===

So, again, we have a riddle where the asker tries to be clever, but in fact, provides insufficient information for a correct answer, and reasonable people can make different inferences from the question, resulting in different “correct” answers.

You know, there’s thread necromancy and then there’s bringing the Lord of All Darkness back from oblivion…

Shutupshutupshutupgoaway!

IT’S A TRAP!

  • Alan

It 100% was a girl, 'cause I fucked 'er.

The comments to wumpus’s post illustrate why “marbles” are always a better choice than “balls”.

Also, holy cow, there are many comments, illustrating why this problem is so tricksy.

So, the answer is 2/3?

Also, WTF 52 pages of the same riddle?!

The answer is 2/3 if it’s marbles, and 1/2 if it’s balls.

The airplane takes off 2/3 of the time.

It’s balls. Trust me, that’s balls. You take a picture of em up real close, that’s what it looks like.

wumpus phrased the problem in his recent blog post much better than the OP

Ahahah this is a pro bump.

You fucking suck, O’Malley.

You’re going bald.

Man, don’t even ask, don’t ever look.

Having just read this thread for the first time, I wish I could say my evening was well-spent. I do understand the ‘riddle’ fully though. I guess that’s something.

http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_04_10.html

I think the think I love most about QT3 is that the OP of this thread could generate a thread 53 pages long.