Let me help you out: condescention is not a valued quality anywhere other than the internet. And I don’t appreciate your misrepresenting my posting history in an effort to make yourself look superior.

In recent P&R posts from you I’ve seen, you start off hostile and defensive and accuse the other posters of arguing in bad faith and being closed-minded. Kind of like, you know, you did in this thread just now.

If that’s your starting point, why are you surprised when people tend to respond in kind?

As IainC points out, there are a number of non-liberal posters in P&R who get perfectly reasonable responses to their posts. You don’t feel that you do.

Now, is that because of everyone else, or could the way you post have anything to do with it? It’s a cliche and all, but like they say: the common element in all your bad relationships is… you.

Hahahahaha

Yeah, I have a problem with assertions that aren’t backed up with evidence. That’s what I was responding it in this thread because I think accusations of racism without a factual basis are dangerous things.

And yeah, my writing style is quite blunt. Since helpful folks like you tell me thick skins are important for posters, one might expect the reverse might me true, but nope. That’s why I take care to include language intending to indicate respect for the person I am responding to if I believe they are engaging in a good faith conversation.

And I don’t if the response is “lol U R incompetent”

Rick, get your P&R out of my yenta, please. I did not give explicit consent, damnit!

I will happily comply with your request. As I indicated earlier, if this form isn’t about things I enjoy, I should move along.

I’d like you to stop misrepresenting your posting history too. I guess we can’t always get what we want!

Is the first retort learned by any human being “No, you!”? Based on my interactions with new talkers, I think it is.

I find it hilariously ironic that the thread you chose to showcase your strict adherence to fact-based arguments is one where you dismissed the fact based arguments of others based on … well actually you never did say what you were basing your objections on because when asked for any kind of facts to back up your own point you refused categorically and repeatedly to do so before flouncing off and declaring victory (yet again).

But apparently I’m the one misrepresenting your posting history…

This coming from the guy who, when asked repeatedly to provide evidence for some nonsense he claimed, categorically refused.

What happens in P&R stays in P&R n00bs!

Yes please. That’s why we have P&R, to keep the cesspit separate from the clear flowing waters of everything else.

Sucks not being able to fool all of the people all of the time, huh?

Fortunately, you have stopped his nefarious plans.

And just in time, too!

Oh, something tells me we haven’t seen the last of him, old chum. Be ever-vigilant!

He would have gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for you meddling kids and your dog.

  • Alan

Yeah, Jeff, I did. You know why? Because you were never, ever going to admit I had a point. You know that. I know that. But you want the win, you can have the win. That’s what I meant by futility.

lol! Is this guy for real?

lol45

Yes, I’m for real. Jeff congratulations on your amazing accomplishment of proving that the deficits aren’t going up, government’s not expanding, and everything is great because I wouldn’t do your damn homework assignment and provide the evidence required to make my statements true. You fixed it!