I do like everyone falling all over themselves to explain why ElGuapo was justifiably banned. Some unresolved tension, perhaps?
I guess when you act douche like you get a lot of goodwill heading your way…
Andrew
2925
This is the Yenta thread, it is what we do here.
No, to Yenta is to gossip. not necessarily taking sides. I yenta just fine without being a side sympathizer.
Wait, what about Detroit?
Kalle
2928
Yes, so have sex with me right now.
Sarkus
2930
People generally fear further bannings when one occurs. They worry that even talking about or referencing the event will get them in trouble. I’m not sure that Tom has ever done anything to justify that feeling, but it does seem to be real. So when someone said EG had been banned, a lot of us accepted that as real.
Wait, he can’t get banned? Like, ever? Is he the Connor MacLeod of Quarter the Three?
Raife
2932
He has like a +4 Meat Shield.
El Guapo is Tom Chick’s Tyler Durden personae (4).
Sarkus
2934
I can’t believe MattG is stooping to arguing about things like what a “day zero patch” is on Fidgit. Talk about being immature about things.
Just move on Matt!
Adree
2935
I can’t believe you’re dragging another sites drama into this one. Just move on Sarkus!
WarrenM
2937
Matt is a highly tenacious attack dog that only goes after inconsequential issues. He’ll see one, get his teeth into it and not let go until another one comes around that looks even less meaningful (“What kind of a name is Alan Wake, amirite?!”). He’ll then switch targets and repeat.
So it’s no longer the posters that are too tense, but the posts themselves? <keanu>Woah.</keanu>
And you’re a sad little man who insults people when it’s both completely unneccessary & when the person in question has no opportunity to respond.
WarrenM
2940
Why the lashing out? Was I incorrect in my description?