Bananas and Nuts

Tortilla · 2010-08-26T10:56:26.000Z

Sounded accurate to me.

tiohn · 2010-08-26T11:01:36.000Z

WarrenM:

Why the lashing out? Was I incorrect in my description?

Why the lashing out? Was he incorrect in his description?

Andrew · 2010-08-26T11:04:04.000Z

Heuristics!

WarrenM · 2010-08-26T11:09:31.000Z

tiohn:

Why the lashing out? Was he incorrect in his description?

Was I lashing out? I thought I asked a perfectly reasonable question.

Matt and I have had it out enough times, keyboard to keyboard, that I think there should be no question that I would say any of that to his virtual face. Right?

If he cares to defend himself, and I doubt he will, he’ll do it when his ban is up. Or if he’s desperately frothing at the mouth with rage, he can use Angie’s login. What-ev.

Cubit · 2010-08-26T11:16:45.000Z

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

Eilonwy · 2010-08-26T11:18:12.000Z

It’s par for the course. Anything I post is clearly Bahimiron controlling me and vice-versa. Even though I hate Firefly and he likes it and we fight D:

Athryn · 2010-08-26T11:18:25.000Z

Cory:

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

What he said. Just because you’re related to/married to someone doesn’t automatically mean that your husband/SO/etc has all of your passwords.

WarrenM · 2010-08-26T11:19:15.000Z

Cory:

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

I’m unclear about where I said that. I simply said that he could use her account if he wanted access to the site during his ban. Everyone is so defensive today.

Zylon · 2010-08-26T11:20:09.000Z

Cory:

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

Oh come on. Next you’ll be telling us that WarrenM and AndrewM aren’t the same person.

Bahimiron · 2010-08-26T11:21:42.000Z

Athryn:

What he said. Just because you’re related to/married to someone doesn’t automatically mean that your husband/SO/etc has all of your passwords.

Whatever, UNION CARBIDE!!!

mmalloy:

Even though I hate Firefly

I feel as if I’ve failed you sometimes. :(

snowcrash22 · 2010-08-26T11:23:43.000Z

what are we yenta-ing about recently, that’s interesting?

BobJustBob · 2010-08-26T11:24:12.000Z

mmalloy:

I hate Firefly

You should let Bahimiron post for you.

Bill_Dungsroman · 2010-08-26T11:24:49.000Z

WarrenM:

I’m unclear about where I said that. I simply said that he could use her account if he wanted access to the site during his ban. Everyone is so defensive today.

But isn’t that against the rules and would only result in Angie’s account being closed as well?

Matt_Perkins · 2010-08-26T11:28:36.000Z

WarrenM:

Matt is a highly tenacious attack dog that only goes after inconsequential issues. He’ll see one, get his teeth into it and not let go until another one comes around that looks even less meaningful (“What kind of a name is Alan Wake, amirite?!”). He’ll then switch targets and repeat.

I find it amusing that you describe other people this way… It’s almost like there is a mirror somewhere!

ElGuapo · 2010-08-26T11:38:01.000Z

Bill D’s been banned so many times he’s like one of those old, reading glasses wearing criminals who tell people how the law works in such detail they think he’s some kind of self made lawyer instead of just really familiar with getting arrested.

Rimbo · 2010-08-26T11:46:51.000Z

Bill Dungsroman:

But isn’t that against the rules and would only result in Angie’s account being closed as well?

Maybe that was his goal in the first place.

ElGuapo:

Bill D’s been banned so many times he’s like one of those old, reading glasses wearing criminals who tell people how the law works in such detail they think he’s some kind of self made lawyer instead of just really familiar with getting arrested.

I dunno, wouldn’t being familiar with the rules lead to one knowing how not to get banned?

Angie_Gallant · 2010-08-26T11:50:26.000Z

WarrenM:

If he cares to defend himself, and I doubt he will, he’ll do it when his ban is up. Or if he’s desperately frothing at the mouth with rage, he can use Angie’s login. What-ev.

First, his ban won’t be up. It’s permanent. Secondly

No, he can’t, because that would be ridiculously disrespectful to me, you jackass.

Sarkus · 2010-08-26T11:50:59.000Z

Cory:

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

I don’t think anyone has said they are. But at the same time it was Angie that bumped this thread to report on Matt’s ban so lets not pretend that they are totally different people who don’t communicate in real life.

Rob_Merritt · 2010-08-26T11:51:30.000Z

Cory:

Angie and Matt aren’t the same person and aren’t responsible for what each other posts, and I really wish people would stop treating them that way.

Thus this is why My wife and I never visit the same forums. At somepoint one of us (usually her and her extreme antireligion views) does something and we both get dragged into the debate with the angry mob.

WarrenM · 2010-08-26T11:52:26.000Z

Angie Gallant:

First, his ban won’t be up. It’s permanent. Secondly

Wow, seriously? I didn’t know that. I apologize then, I shouldn’t have said anything about him in that case.

No, he can’t, because that would be ridiculously disrespectful to me, you jackass.

I meant with your permission, but OK, fair enough…