Bananas and Nuts

Lizard_King · 2010-10-07T05:07:38.000Z

Raife:

He recently added links to all versions of the chart in the first post.

Excellent, I guess I didn’t scroll down far enough before bitching about it.

TimElhajj · 2010-10-07T12:55:45.000Z

Bitch first, apologize later. That’s always been my approach!

Matt_Bowyer · 2010-10-07T13:08:55.000Z

Something I wish we had was a graph showing what subforum we all posted in the most. That way, if someone has less than 500 posts and 85% of them are in P&R, well…

Mightynute · 2010-10-07T13:13:39.000Z

Matt Bowyer:

Something I wish we had was a graph showing what subforum we all posted in the most. That way, if someone has less than 500 posts and 85% of them are in P&R, well…

They get the title “Complete Berk”.

Raife · 2010-10-07T13:29:17.000Z

Mine would probably be about:
EE - 60%
Games - 30%
Movies, Books, Tech & Cabal - 10%

There’s not that much discussion in Cabal, so you guys aren’t really missing anything.

Matt_Bowyer · 2010-10-07T13:34:15.000Z

I’m pretty sure I’m something like 60% Games, 35% EE, 5% Books/Hardware forums.

TimElhajj · 2010-10-07T13:48:12.000Z

I’m 99% EE (and it shows!)

Lizard_King · 2010-10-07T13:49:01.000Z

Matt Bowyer:

Something I wish we had was a graph showing what subforum we all posted in the most. That way, if someone has less than 500 posts and 85% of them are in P&R, well…

Unfortunately, one of the downsides of killing the Koontz was that you no longer have anyone creating strangely detailed analyses of the forum like that.

Matt_Bowyer · 2010-10-07T14:20:47.000Z

TimElhajj:

I’m 99% EE (and it shows!)

Tim, I think you’ve shown plenty already.

JM1 · 2010-10-07T16:16:55.000Z

Mightynute:

They get the title “Complete Berk”.

Berk is such a great word.

inactive_user · 2010-10-18T08:39:25.000Z

Foxstab got it, I assume for this.

Figure out a conspiracy theory to fit this one, I dare you!

RyanMichael · 2010-10-18T08:41:59.000Z

Finally, a banning that actually helps the signal to noise ratio.

Cubit · 2010-10-18T08:49:08.000Z

Abilio_Carvalho · 2010-10-18T10:45:14.000Z

unfortunately, it’s probably a “cool off” temporary ban. If ever someone required a “body of work” kick in the nads…

salwon · 2010-10-18T12:49:35.000Z

The worst thing about Foxstab was that he’d disappear for a while, then come in spewing bullshit everywhere. And I’d be all like, “What the fuck, where did all these posts come from that make no sense,” and then I’d look to the left, and everything would fall into place.

But yeah, the final kicker was the Blizzard thing. I guess I wasn’t the only one royally pissed off about that.

stusser · 2010-10-18T12:51:04.000Z

Why not put him on ignore?

Just sayin’.

Demon_G_Sides · 2010-10-18T12:53:22.000Z

Oh god don’t drag out that defense. you’re asking for a huge argument.

Tyjenks · 2010-10-18T13:01:51.000Z

I don’t think stusser meant it as a defense of these specific comments, just the use of ignore in general if you don’t like the dude’s (or anyone else’s) posting pattern.

inactive_user · 2010-10-18T13:17:00.000Z

Because you still get the Dirts of the world dragging half the damn threads in P&R wildly off topic, for instance.

And half the forum will call you childish if you admit to using the ignore feature ;)

BobJustBob · 2010-10-18T13:23:28.000Z

And people keep quoting the shitbags you’re ignoring.