Bananas and Nuts

[JM1]

Look at you. You’re trying to paint me with the most crazy, vile label you can find, so that you can feel justified to continue your poor behavior.

Preeeeeeeetty sure Buceph was making a joke about the “with us or against us” mentality.

[nlanza]

Look at you. You’re trying to paint me with the most crazy, vile label you can find, so that you can feel justified to continue your poor behavior.

Which is totally unfair, because everyone knows you’re just standing up for the little guy, nothing in mind but the purest motives.

It’s noble, really. And sexy. Women must be throwing themselves at you left and right with every sub-Adree-caliber image you lazily google up and post here.

[Mrenda]

Honestly, with all this talk of the “thread cop” and “morality police” being thrown around, the only person I see that fits that label is Jerri Blank.

Jerri has been fairly reasonable over the last few days, despite fundamentally disagreeing with something I said.

As someone already alluded, it’s not so much morality “police” it’s morality assholes. People who believe they are the sole bearers of morality, and anyone who disagrees with them has been called “child abuser lovers.” People who have the arrogance to think that someone reserving judgement or giving someone the benefit of the doubt isn’t as good as them. Because they are the only people who despise child abuse. That’s fucking enraging.

[nlanza]

Because they are the only people who despise child abuse. That’s fucking enraging.

I will send you $20 USD via PayPal if you can find me someone in this thread who actually holds this view.

[Bahimiron]

Honestly, with all this talk of the “thread cop” and “morality police” being thrown around, the only person I see that fits that label is Jerri Blank.

Let’s not forget Lorini, whose primary contribution to the B&N thread has been to tell people that they really don’t have the right to question anything Tom does. I donno about morality police, but she’s got thread cop down pat.

and anyone who disagrees with them has been called “child abuser lovers.”

Funny that you’d put that in quotes. I put it in quotes too when I did a google search for the phrase. It came up twice. Both times used by you. Do you have links?

[Athryn]

I think that’s painting it a bit extreme.

(Edit: what Buceph said)

[Mrenda]

Let’s not forget Lorini, whose primary contribution to the B&N thread has been to tell people that they really don’t have the right to question anything Tom does. I donno about morality police, but she’s got thread cop down pat.

Funny that you’d put that in quotes. I put it in quotes too when I did a google search for the phrase. It came up twice. Both times used by you. Do you have links?

They’re scare quotes.

And they’re alluding to an ongoing perception that people who called for reason were tolerating child abuse. Not a ludicrous thing to suggest.

And yes, I know that means I love child abusers.

[kerzain]

[quote=“nlanza,post:4384,topic:51803”]

Because they are the only people who despise child abuse. That’s fucking enraging.

I will send you $20 USD via PayPal if you can find me someone in this thread who actually holds this view.[/QUOTE]
I’ll admit to this if I get get half.

[John_Many_Jars]

So next time I’m gonna fuck a honeydew instead, but I’m worried that my grip won’t be as good on the smoother rind. Any tips?

[ReptileHouse]

I asked a friend’s roommate and he said that a good pair of rubber gloves works wonders.

[balut]

I would have preferred Morality Cabal.

I prefer Morality Covenant. It sounds less “dungeon rituals wearing robes and goat masks” and more “dungeon rituals with armor and swords, and maybe a chalice”. And really, who doesn’t like a good chalice?

[ReptileHouse]

The dungeon rituals with masks and robes are more likely to end in a big orgy, though. The one with swords, somebody puts an eye out with one of those things.

I’m totally with you on the Chalice, though. Those are awesome.

[John_Many_Jars]

I asked a friend’s roommate and he said that a good pair of rubber gloves works wonders.

Hmmmm, yes, yes indeed

[Mrenda]

I think that’s painting it a bit extreme.

(Edit: what Buceph said)

I will send you $20 USD via PayPal if you can find me someone in this thread who actually holds this view.

All these posts paint someone as tolerating child abuse;

You are a disgusting and despicable person.
Please get the fuck off my planet.

It’s good of you stand up for spatzi and Munky, Tim. If that’s not a pair of little guys just acting right while the meany-pants majority creams them, then I don’t know what is.

Is “acting right” here the child-beating or the racism?

I get confused sometimes, see.

When you’re done building that strawman over there, how about you step down from your tower of abuser-sheltering privilege and engage honestly?

Do you remember the part where a child abuser who brought his own personal business to the board had Tom sticking up for him because nobody’s personal business should matter on the board?

I can dig people not being okay with smoking pot. But it’s fucking astounding that there seems to be a group of people who are okay with child abuse and racism.

And Jerri obviously saw the same thing I saw.

So what you’re saying, Tim, is that you love racists and child beaters! And you seemed like such a nice guy! I certainly hope you never run across a child who’s not white - you’d put a whuppin’ on him so fast…

[kerzain]

I have no idea why JMJ is trying to have sex with melons and gloves.

[John_Many_Jars]

I have no idea why JMJ is trying to have sex with melons and gloves.

Someone bring kerzain up to speed; we have serious issues to address here.

[kerzain]

Well, it’s a fascinating alternative to the thread-cop stuff.

[ReptileHouse]

Well, it’s a fascinating alternative to the thread-cop stuff.

Precisely. And dino’ing this thread would feel kinda weird.

[Matt_Perkins]

thread cops aren’t necessary, since we have a mess of civility cops…

[John_Many_Jars]

I figured a watermelon would just be too pulpy; am I wrong? Also the seeds are unpredictable.