Bananas and Nuts

kerzain · 2010-11-07T18:09:15.000Z

xq2x0.jpg434×554

Major_Icehole · 2010-11-07T18:43:04.000Z

I’m hungry for fruit all of a sudden.

Martin_Guerre · 2010-11-07T19:02:45.000Z

Reminds of Novel - Peach

TimElhajj · 2010-11-07T21:35:04.000Z

kerzain:

Context is everything. Well played.

TimElhajj · 2010-11-07T21:36:14.000Z

kerzain:

sexually charged image of fruits

Context is everything.

Lynch · 2010-11-08T04:19:37.000Z

Why did
get a - intention- custom user title?

JM1 · 2010-11-08T04:29:48.000Z

Not too difficult.

Hans_Lauring · 2010-11-08T04:33:24.000Z

TimElhajj:

Context is everything.

Context doesn’t matter at all and I have reported every post referencing fruit.

Jarmo · 2010-11-08T04:41:04.000Z

I’ll never look at a fruit salad the same way again.

John_Many_Jars · 2010-11-08T09:32:07.000Z

Hans Lauring:

Context doesn’t matter at all and I have reported every post referencing fruit.

Aw c’mon, you’ve always been a little fruity yourself.

jellyfish · 2010-11-10T23:37:02.000Z

Bahimiron · 2010-11-17T04:22:39.000Z

So I guess Hans is out for the crime of disagreeing with Tom and pointing out his hypocritical bullshit.

WarrenM · 2010-11-17T04:38:46.000Z

Bahimiron:

So I guess Hans is out for the crime of disagreeing with Tom and pointing out his hypocritical bullshit.

“Is this a trick question or are you just looking for yet another thread where you can antagonize me? Because that’s not getting old!”

Sounds like a “body of work” issue.

Kalle · 2010-11-17T04:41:14.000Z

otherwise known as a “don’t dare argue with Tom” issue.

Hunty · 2010-11-17T04:46:42.000Z

He’ll be back shortly, no doubt. Seems a weird one. The PMS jibe wasn’t the smartest play, but I can’t really see what else Tom’s got his knickers in such a twist over to be going into a “woe is me, another thread where Hanzii hounds me” routine.

As for a “body of work” issue, I can’t think of anything in particular he’s done that even toed the line, really. I’ve certainly never got any impression of him hounding Tom, or even doing more than indulging in the occasional bit of light badinage. Though perhaps someone who keeps one of those exhaustive files of everyone’s activity can set me straight on that score.

Lynch · 2010-11-17T04:47:41.000Z

About damn time. This self-satisfied idot should be IP- and permabanned.

WarrenM · 2010-11-17T05:02:13.000Z

And yet Lynch is still here.

Bahimiron · 2010-11-17T05:14:34.000Z

WarrenM:

“Is this a trick question or are you just looking for yet another thread where you can antagonize me? Because that’s not getting old!”

Sounds like a “body of work” issue.

That would actually be the ‘hypocritical bullshit’ to which I was referring. Hans only mentioned bannings because people have been banned for posting inappropriate images, so he wanted to know what the line was. In this instance, Tom is the one who decided to drag in a spat he and Hans had been having over in the Walking Dead thread, as Hans pointed out in his response. Really, look at Hans’ ‘body of work’ and you’ll see a guy whose body of work is a lot less damning than a lot of people, and that lot of people includs the both of us, Warren.

Lynch:

About damn time.

And see? The litmus test of stupid agrees with the banning, so clearly it was a bad call.

Kalle · 2010-11-17T05:18:05.000Z

Having a passive-aggressive dick of a moderator couldn’t possibly end badly.

Raife · 2010-11-17T05:20:12.000Z

Tom should be banned for dragging shit in from other discussions. Get on it, stusser.