No, it doesn’t. It’s what happened, though.

Eh, he posted something that was pretty classless, since Munky was obviously trying to end the entire debacle an he continued it. I’m not saying it was banworthy, but it was a dick move.

Seems a lot more like Munky posted something pretty classless. And he wasn’t even banned.

He also got rid of and tried to end the discussion of it. I once posted a gory .gif of the bullfighter, but I decided it was a bit much and edited it so that it was just a link. Does that mean I should be banned for posting a pretty offensive .gif, even if I took steps to rectify my mistake?

Depends on if anyone else saw it.

So a quantum banning then.

Depends on your character. Do you sincerely feel that causing us suffering through a .gif was wrong? Or were you just afraid of reactions?
It also depends on your cultures norms regarding the posting of .gifs - who are we to tell you what .gifs are wrong?

Hah, great answer.

It is a four-letter profanity, a crude word referencing a portion of the female anatomy.

Worse pics have been posted. Like that hand with the thingies in it. Ewww.

So that’s how you get to 20,000 posts.
(takes notes.)

Very interesting thread.

Indeed.

Thank you for the valuable input, Albert.

Amazing.

It was Adree who posted the court stuff. Marcus just quoted Munky’s initial post, which Munky had tried to delete. Then Marcus got confrontational and told him he beat his wife and kids, which is probably what got him banned. The edited remains of the thread are here.

I’m super-jazzed that we might get to start up that debate again.

Start restraining order thread for massive damage.