The existence of a baron for one. “highly probable” is less than “certainly exists”. Yet a lot of what you think you will know from the outcome depends on this.
I don’t know who the undertaker is, so I don’t know that this is true, because I cannot check their whisper log to see if they could’ve gotten the info from someone else. It’s certainly not something Craig said publicly.
I’m defending the idea that we shouldn’t delay YET ANOTHER NIGHT to try to get rid of the poisoner.
I see you edited your post while I was responding, you added:
Maybe that’s the disconnect then, that you have a different standard for certainties. Maybe what you’re saying is that it’s probable that you will learn a lot from killing me.
You don’t have all the info. I think Craig can confirm that it would be really strange for a Baron not to be present, specially because the lies that would have been to be made to create the possibility of no Baron would have not helped the Evil team at all (it’s all very middling info).
Way more probable than learning anything from killing rowe, that for sure. If we are being methodical, you are the best target.
And the way you are defending yourself when your role can’t offer any more info is really strange and to me is shifting my suspicions from rowe to you.
But do you then see how that certainty looks strange for someone not given all the facts?
Yay. Damned if I do, damned if I don’t. I’ll just reiterate again that I’m not defending me so much as trying to get rid of the poisoner. I understand how they look the same to someone without my particular info.
No, if you hadn’t defended yourself I would still be suspecting rowe more. Remember that I thought it was better to kill you even if I thought it was more likely rowe was lying. Because the important thing this early on is narrowing down possibilities.