I mean Hastings wasn’t Harold’s fault because a) he didn’t choose to be invaded from all sides at once, and b) he was recovering from Stamford Bridge a few days before. Whereas the Tories have deliberately chosen Brexit.

Although it’s not British, I believe the Battle of Manzikert is a better parallel: it was a battle the Byzantines chose to initiate, the campaign was handled badly with mixed signals to/from various allies, and the battle itself was a major disaster for the Byzantines, marked by retreat, treachery, dissension and ultimate defeat.

So May refused to change her position and just repeated her deal over and over again?

If only we could have foreseen this outcome.

We are digressing wildly here, but by selling his brother out and not killing him, he let his brother (Tostig) team up with Hadrada the Dane, so he (Harold) did open himself up to a double invasion.

It’s been questioned whether it was worth fighting in the north.

Could the Danes have occupied and held the north for any length of time?

Following Stamford Bridge, did Harold have to force march down to the south. I mean, it was some 100 miles in 3 days with full equipment I think.

That would be impressive by today’s standards.

And this is pure madness…so stupid, so weird, and supposedly in the name of the people.

I enjoyed this description of the current situation from Charlie Stross.

I think if you look through history, you’ll find that some of the worst decisions made by man kind have been done in the name of populism.

Sounds like the twit olympics.

As well as some great decisions. Teddy Roosevelt’s term in office was in part due to populism at the time.

Bismark followed the will of the people when it came to providing a basic social net for people (to undercut his opponents).

Personally, I think religion has been used to justify way worse decisions.

Then how about religion, populism and nationalism? All in one.

I guess May’s outreach to Corbyn to strike a compromise deal actually meant she was just asking him to agree to her deal after all.

It’s easy for me to say because I’m not affected by it, but at this point it’s just like… look, if you are hell-bent on going forward with this, then just pull the trigger and get it over with so the cleanup crew can get to work on fixing the mess you’re going to leave behind. The perpetual state of extensions and gridlock just doesn’t seem sustainable.

IMG_20190407_193808

Ireland publishes its no deal procedures for agricultural trade.. Among other things, this seems to mean no trade across the land border, at least until Ireland builds and staffs some border inspection posts there.

I don’t know whether to flip a table, cry or cry with laughter. Perhaps all three.

That is (sadly) hilarious.

Yeah, I find that just sad. Not sad for the farmer, just sad at the thought process (or lack of it) behind a lot of the current movements in the US and the UK. You see similar stuff in the US ag business.

Well, if any of you Brits need a couch to stay on for a while after Brexit just me know. We still have insulin here, for now!

Maybe he hopes the UK will take-in Mexicans?

The entire African continent will be happy to come do farm labour…

:roll eyes: