Interesting times for British democracy.

Made the mistake of clicking through on the tweets from various MPs. No surpise that way too many people don’t understand how parliamentary representative government is supposed to work and are cheering Johnson’s authoritarian subversion of parliament.

TBH, though, I’m kind of flabbergasted at the MP’s complaining now. It has been rumored this would happen for a while, and it’s always been clear that BJ would ram through Brexit one way or the other. a big part of the story of Brexit in the history books will be how disunited and indecisive the opposition was. Even with this move, there is still an opportunity to stop BJ, but it will require effective leadership which seems completely absent.

Indeed. Someone will blame Jeremy Corbyn in 3…2…1…

Now seems as good a time as any to review the government’s own civil contingency report, the leaked Operation Yellowhammer document. The govt tried to play it down as nothing but worst-case scenarios, but

A senior Whitehall source told the Sunday Times: “This is not Project Fear, this is the most realistic assessment of what the public face with no deal. These are likely, basic, reasonable scenarios – not the worst case.”

Some highlights include:

Northern Ireland

On Day 1 of No Deal, Her Majesty’s government will activate the “no new checks with limited exceptions” model announced on March 13, establishing a legislative framework and essential operations and system on the ground, to avoid an immediate risk of a return to a hard border on the UK side.

The model is likely to prove unsustainable because of economic, legal and biosecurity risks. […]

Disruption to key sectors and job losses are likely to result in protests and direct action with road blockades. Price and other differentials are likely to lead to the growth of the illegitimate economy. This will be particularly severe in border communities where criminal and dissident groups already operate with greater freedom. Given the tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade, there will be pressure to agree new arrangements to supersede the Day 1 model within days or weeks.

This is all assuming that the EU plays along and can suspend checks on people and goods traveling to the south. Either way, I’m glad others here are more optimistic than I about how this will play out, because this still looks like a complete leap into the dark with nothing but a tissue-thin idea of a plan on what to do next, rolling the dice on the GFA.

Protests and police

Protests and counter-protests will take place across the UK, using up police resources. There may also be a rise in public disorder and community tensions.

The poor

Low-income groups will be disproportionately affected by rises in the price of food and fuel.

Public water services are likely to remain largely unaffected, thanks to actions now being taken by water companies. The most significant single risk is a failure in the chemicals supply chain. The likelihood of this is considered low, and the impact is likely to be local, affecting only hundreds of thousands of people.

Drugs and disease

i) The Border Delivery Group/Department for Transport planning assumption on reduced flow rates describes a pre-mitigation reasonable worst-case flow rate that could be as low as 40% on Day 1 of No Deal via the short straits [main Channel crossings], with significant disruption lasting up to six months. Unmitigated, this will have an impact on the supply of medicines and medical supplies. […] While some products can be stockpiled, others cannot because of short shelf lives. It will not be practical to stockpile six months’ supplies.

There seems to be some form of hold-your-nose-and-just-do-it cross party unity over the last few days, which is certainly required now.

but still the Sampson Option (i.e let it all come crashing down) still seems to loom when those in the Westminster bubble come to actually working with the hard left loons and their 40 year long baggage train of hard left lunacy. Its not “Corbyn” its his entire cadre that most hate with a passion. Especially among the Tory remainers/soft Brexiters/anti-No Dealers.

A Labour under one of Corbyn’s non-Eurosceptic opponents in the leadership challenge would have probably guaranteed a victory for Remain let alone provided a strong, unified opposition to Brexit over the last 3 years.

Right on time!

Well yes, I dont believe anti-Western Marxist-Leninism, Communism, Trotrskyism or Maoism is the solution and I’m still left enough to want to see direct action against the hard right Tories.

You can if you want, link evidence that the Corbyn faction and leadership weren’t closely engaged for decades with Marxist-Leninists, Communists, Trotskyists and Maoists.

You’re hardly alone. I don’t think most people in Britain - even in Labour - want to overthrow capitalism; they just want the NHS better funded.

Yes, and that’s why if we voted in Liz or Yvette or even Team Jellyfish Burnham we wouldn’t be in this situation.

So the Queen approved the request to suspend Parliament. What does that even mean? The UK seems like a shit show on fire right now.

A summary I read this morning indicated that the Queen’s role in this is essentially ceremonial. She didn’t really have the option to say “no”.

Hey, we’re right behind them. Maybe not so much in the conflagration department but we’re catching up!

I figured as much, but I was curious what would happen if she did.

Notting Hill

If the Queen defied the PM, it would be a bigger blow to democracy than the PM defying Parliament.

I’m not sure what happens if a majority of MPs were to write to the Queen saying they disagree.

This is why the PM is supposed to resign if they don’t command the confidence of the Commons…

It’s basically the plot of season 2 of the UK House of Cards. It doesn’t end well for the monarch.

On the other hand, the idea that the monarch must acquiesce to anything, no matter how repugnant it is to democracy, more or less demonstrates that the idea of the monarchy is a sham. If they must e.g. invite someone like Mosley[*] to form a government because that’s how things are done, then scrap the whole thing. You’d think at some point, some monarch would grasp that, and rebel against being an accessory to pernicious nonsense.

(*) Yes, I know that didn’t happen, but nothing in the system prevents it from happening.

Also the plot of Episode 3 of Star Wars. That doesn’t end well for anybody.