Honestly, I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make at this point other than your usual bait-post argument BS.
Let’s unpack it, shall we?
Here’s @LeeAbe replying to @Tim_N:
For me that doesn’t matter. She agreed to secure classified documents. Not only did she not do so, she gave them out to a subversive group with little to no consideration to what she was giving out. That is treason. When I signed up for it, I agreed to protect the info given to me. I didn’t agree to secure only the documents I agreed with. If you do not like that info, go through lawful means and/or accept the punishment given.[/quote]
You then jumped in with:
One day you might fuck up and leave a safe unlocked, and your attitude will change as to the necessity of such actions.
Guys like Hannsen and Ames are made an example of. To whatever extent deterrent will work for someone in Mannings situation, and it is not much I expect, it has probably.been served.
I know what he did and why, but there’s enough shit in the world it seems without adding more to it.[/quote]
So, once again you’re the one that used “leave a safe unlocked”. Not Tim. Not Lee. I’m not even sure if anyone else did until you dropped that post. Care to explain what you were going for?