How about the Dakota’s requiring a street address to vote, when Native Americans living on reservation land by law are not apportioned addresses but use PO boxes instead. A move explicitly and only used to prevent Native American citizens from voting.
There is a god damn huge difference between trying to get more voters to turn out, and carefully crafting policy to make it so minority and poor voters cannot vote.
I mean, Christ, it’s not even comparable.
Getting more people to vote? objectively good
Specifically targeting groups to prevent them from voting? Objectively evil.
You do see that, don’t you? And you see why saying ‘Democrats want more people to vote, since they will vote for them, is the same as Republicans preventing people from voting’ is getting a massive negative reaction.