For the better part of the last year I’ve pondered the meaning of the rise of this conspiracy-fueled right wing movement in our country. It isn’t new, of course; indeed it’s been ever-present for decades, but along the fringes of society, at a scale in size and fervor more quaint than dangerous.
Over the last several years that has changed dramatically. Let us discuss why.
I’ll preface this by saying that I am neither a sociologist nor a psychologist. These are just the mildly inebriated thoughts of an intellectually curious citizen. I live in one of the most Conservative counties in Michigan, so needless to say I’m surrounded every day by Trump supporters. They range from teenager to retiree, lower to upper class, high school drop-out to PhD, squeaky clean to frequent arrestee, and everywhere in-between.
With such a wide range of people, you’d think finding commonality would be all but impossible, but in my personal experience I believe the two biggest factors at play here are gullibility and an unyielding desire to be part of a community; a fear of being outcast. These are two traits that I believe are at the heart of this issue.
I am not someone prone to conspiracy theory in the least, but for the sake of understanding I have allowed myself to gaze briefly into that abyss; to genuinely attempt to feel why so many are so attracted to its pull. What I found was that believing in conspiracy theories above all makes you feel like you’re in control. No longer are you a nameless cog in the wheel of society, impotent and blind to the machinations of those in power. No longer are you ignorant of the intricacies of science and mathematics. Now you have the answers, and the world is no longer frightening and unpredictable. Now you never have to listen to somebody tell you that they know more than you do, because you know that they’re just a liar with an agenda. You know the truth. And nobody can take that away from you.
And now you’re part of a community. And that community is safe because it’s full of people that think like you, and won’t question you. And now you know who the real enemy is. They’re the cause of all the problems, and they’re why life outside the community is uncomfortable, with all the questions and lies and refusal to believe the obvious truth. And even if you didn’t want to believe these things, your family and friends do, and you can’t imagine disagreeing with them and being outcast or considered a traitor.
It’s an extremely attractive idea, to the right kind of mind. The intellectually lazy, emotionally fragile, egocentric, and narcisistic mind. The kind of mind that struggles with critical thinking.
And like the great Mark Twain said: It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.
Once you convince someone of something, they’ll seek to protect the validity of the claim in order to protect their own ego.
But I don’t want you for a second to believe that these are inherently bad people. Some of the people I know personally who are convinced of these things are genuinely kind-hearted and well-meaning.
These are not evil minds. These are minds besieged. It’s human psychology, weaponized. A blitzkrieg of misinformation designed to brainwash, or at the very least make it so that people simply don’t know what to believe anymore.
Heinous people like Alex Jones are culpable of course, but I doubt they are the key perpetrators in what we’ve seen over the last few years. The Mueller Report showed us that Russian Intelligence was working within these means five years ago, and I think that’s the far more likely scenario. And it’s something I’ve expected for quite a while.
This is the warfare of the future, and it’s only the beginning. We haven’t even begun to delve into the world of deepfakes yet. It’s a kind of warfare free societies like ours are susceptible to in particular, versus somewhere like China where the Government could squelch any and all dissonance and better control information.
The question is, how can it be combatted in the age of social media? How can you pull someone back from the brink once they’ve not only been convinced of a falsehood, but also simultaneously convinced that anyone arguing against the falsehood is a liar with an agenda?