No, you have to care, because you are judging the cop by an impossible standard.
You are saying that the cop should have recognized that the kid went from armed to unarmed, while the gun passed behind his back, and that he should have magically made this assessment in the literal hundredths of a second when it took place.
That is not a reasonable thing to expect a human brain to do.
Several thousand gun crimes is nothing, man. The US has like 40k death salone by gun each year, and that doesn’t scratch the surface of all the crime involving guns.
This is part of the problem right? We have way too many guns on our streets, and that means we have more interactions between cops and armed people. And sadly some portion of those interactions are gonna end like this.
I don’t think the UK solutions are gonna necessarily work in the US, while we have as many guns on our streets as we do currently.
I think it’s reasonable to ask the questions you’re asking here, which is “how do we not put the cop in this situation”. But a lot of folks are saying the cop made the wrong move, and I don’t think that’s accurate.
Watch the video yourself, Rowe. He did in fact have that gun in his hand when he turned. You see it go behind him as he starts to turn. And then you get a single frame after he makes the turn, as he gets shot, where you see his hand is empty.
As far as the gun being loaded, any reasonable person would assume the gun was loaded. It had been fired already. (and yes, it was in fact loaded, so trying to suggest that no one should have assumed it was loaded is nonsensical… I don’t think that’s the argument you want to try to make).