You’ll get more quarter from jjz. I don’t even know why you continue to engage.

Tabled! 59-41.

What conservatives are those? There aren’t many of them here at qt3, and I havent seen any of them post in this thread recently.

Indeed, the Republicans are rather uncooperative, don’t you agree?

So, is refusing a vote a better/more fruitful approach than modifying it and sending it back to the House?

BOTH sides are uncooperative. Even before the balanced budget amendment crap was added to the bill the senate would never have voted in favor of the bill from the house. Again they would rather destroy the worlds economy then give the repubs a win, just like the repubs would do the same to deny the dems a win.

BTW, who were the 6 Republicans who voted to table the House bill in the Senate?

Indeed, the Republicans are very uncooperative, wouldn’t you agree?

I thought they were going to vote it down? So what happens when the table the bill? Are they going to modify it?

The Senate has already voted it down.

Per NPR, they were Senators that didn’t consider the House bill conservative enough! OMGWTFBBQ! I’d be curious to find out who they were as well. Would C-Span have that info?

BOTH sides are uncooperative. I can use smaller words if you like as what I wrote before seems to have confused you in some way.

From the cspan front page

The Senate voted 59-41 to table, or discard, the House bill, after which Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) brought up his version of a debt ceiling bill, which lasts through 2012 and cuts $2.2 billion in spending. 6 Republicans joined 51 Democrats and two Independents to table the Boehner plan. Republicans voting to table were: DeMint (SC), Graham (SC), Hatch (UT), Lee (UT), Paul (KY), and Vitter (LA).

Indeed, the Republicans are very much more uncooperative, wouldn’t you agree?

I can use smaller words if you like as what I wrote before seems to have confused you in some way.

Indeed, your posts are fascinating as an illustration of the optimal strategy for playing chicken.

If one side makes massive concessions, and the other side makes even more demands, which side is being uncooperative?

Both sides are being uncooperative?

http://http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/07/nancy_pelosi_declines_further.html

Apparently passing the republican plan and budget will destroy life as we know it on the planet. At least according to Nancy Pelosi.

Well, that’s all true I guess. But we absolutely would default in 6 months. That constitutional amendment doesn’t have a remote chance of passing. So what’s the point really? Give all the millionaires time to get out of the stock market?

Of course the fact that there was a plan being worked on last week between both sides and then the president is the one who made more demands for another 400 billion in taxes and got that plan scrapped escapes you.

I wish they hadnt of put in the balanced budget amendment vote in there, but even before that was put in the dems were refusing to pass the increase.

So they knew the outcome was no different either way so they gave themselves political cover on a vote they knew the outcome of so they could make a political point.

Gee thats kinda like the explanation I always get of people excusing the vote Obama made against the debt increase in 06. The outcome was never in doubt so he got to make a political vote…