Technically, Fallout 3 already has swords.

All I know is that I am really excited by the thought of Fallout 4 using this engine.

The screenshots I’ve seen suggest they are no longer using Ugly Face™ Technology, so that’s good.

falls off chair

Somehow I’ve never played an Elder Scrolls game. Can one just grab one and go, or are you missing a lot by not playing the previous ones?

This. Although, I’m not sure what would be a cool area to do the next game. California would be cool but probably by this time-line is too recovered from the apocalypse. Maybe if they dropped another bomb and set everyone back again…? :)

Bethesda probably wants to stay away from the west coast, considering all the other Fallout games. I could see them doing New York, though.

Grab any and go. The timelines the games are all a couple of hundred years apart.

Furthermore, the games were all released roughly 5 years apart IIRC, so each one is a significant upgrade in engine tech and game design.

This is how I play as well. I will say that in Oblivion, it was a lot of fun, but some parts were extremely hard for me.

I … um … I’m not sure what to say. Did you mean better than the improvements shown in that video?

Understand that there are scores of spells, weapons, items and skills in game. Previously you had to pull up the mini-spreadsheet, scroll through worksheets, I mean tabs, along the bottom, then scroll through the rows, I mean spells, to select what you wanted. Inefficient, even for PC.

The new UI was simplistic, easy, and fast. What more did you want in the UI?

Bethesda has a history of hinting at the next game in each game of their series. People knew Skyrim was next for Elder Scrolls well before it was announced, for example. And the one big hint in Fallout 3 that was never expanded on via DLC was “the Commonwealth,” which is pretty widely believed to refer to the Boston area. So that’s most likely where Fallout 4 will be set.

Yeah, but isn’t Virginia also referred to as “the Commonwealth?” And also where a significant portion of Fallout 3 happens to be set?

I don’t remember exactly what they called it, but The Brotherhood of Steel referred to an area where they stopped for a while as they were moving east before moving on to where they meet up with you in F3. That’s probably what they’re implying is the next setting.

Let’s see, how about this: The woman who was confused by the hide armor in her inventory was Morgan Webb. TRUE STORY!

I wish I could remember who said it, but when I was talking to a couple folks who’d played the hour-long demo, someone noted that we all sounded like a bunch of little kills telling a story. “And so then I went down the road and there were these wolves and then I was a wizard and I shot them with a bow and arrow and then I fought these giants and then there was this castle and there were fish in this waterfall…”

-Tom

Sold.

That’s the kind of thing that makes me love Bethesda RPGs, warts and all.

Your comment calls to mind the transcript from a lecture given at MIT some 11 years ago, entitled Games as Popular Culture, wherein Bethesda founder Christopher Weaver said the following:

I have no idea what the hell version of Daggerfall he’s referring to in the sentence I bolded.

No, the Commonwealth is said to be north of DC and the guy you meet in Rivet City also refers to “the Institute” or something that is widely believed to be a reference to MIT. There is also a reference to the Commonwealth and Institute in Broken Steel because that is where the scientist lady (Dr. Li) who helps you in the main game has supposedly left for.

That is a reference to Pittsburgh, already covered by the second FO3 DLC.

Ah. That makes sense, then.

Although a post-nuclear Boston probably isn’t any easier to drive around. It does have subway tunnels, though…

It was? (my memory apparently sucks) Man, the Brotherhood are jerks for leaving it such a mess. I’m going to have to bill them for cleanup services.