Sorry, didn’t word that clearly - I specifically meant the whole Orwellian “calling the thing your doing the exact opposite of what you’re actually doing” aspect. You know the “Free Speech Protection Act” would close down as much opposition speech as possible.

You don’t need to be massively incompetent, you just need to buy into your hype and think you’re real life Tony Stark.

Why wouldn’t you be able to barge into a company and redo everything in no time flat with your massive brain?

And why wouldn’t all the employees follow you, genius that you are?

And asking employees to sacrifice and suffer probably works better when you’ve been in the company for years, going through the rough times with them, if you’re just the asshole billionaire who dropped in outta the sky, probably doesn’t have the same weight.

Elon is making a hash of this because he’s a particular combination of rich, arrogant and stupid. None of it is part of any super clever secret plan. It’s just a kind of shitposting on a grand, global scale, enabled by the policy failures which allow people to accumulate vast wealth.

It’s a far-fetched conspiracy theory. Why would an egotist like Musk set himself up to be a public failure in this way?

Didn’t musk join up with Tesla and SpaceX after they already existed?

Yes. PayPal too, basically.

Yes. He made some good choices but I don’t think he really created anything himself.

Uh-oh. Here comes another round of the endless cycle.

“Musk didn’t create anything!”
“But only his genius could’ve managed them to success!”
“Any fool can buy a successful company!”
“He’s a great man!”
“Great man theory sucks!”

No, Twitter didn’t just crumble into dust overnight. And Elon Musk, being Elon Musk, is probably feeling pretty good this morning. He’s cut costs by 75% (on paper, anyway), the app is still running, and usership is up. All thanks to his brilliant leadership! The future looks bright, at least in his head.

So Twitter isn’t going to go away today, or tomorrow. Then what is going to happen instead?

Well, remember all the chaos from a couple weeks ago? Not the firing chaos, the other chaos. Rampant impersonation, failures of moderation, lack of clarity about what features did what, lack of clarity about the business model, advertisers leaving, that particular chaos?

None of that ever went away. And now, with (we think) 3/4 of the employees gone, it’s going to get massively worse. There’s no one left to moderate, no one left to figure out a new business model, no one left to implement it, no one left to mollify advertisers and convince them to stay.

To deal with the worst of the content issues, Musk will doubtless turn to “community moderation.” But we already know what Musk’s idea of that is: his toadies will be the gatekeepers. By Christmas I expect all criticism of Musk will be verboten, and the only hate-speech enforcement you’ll see will be against the “woke.” By spring I expect the discourse on Twitter to be about as diverse as on Truth Social.

But let’s not linger on that aspect, as important as it is. Let’s think about Twitter the business instead. Musk has ambitious plans for a subscription model, but everyone who is not Musk thinks it’s a bullshit pipe dream: all he’s managed so far is to break the subscription model they already had. Musk has ambitious plan to make Twitter into a WeChat clone that does everything from facilitate banking services to serve video - but he’s fired most of his staff, and made it clear to the outside talent he would need to build such a thing that Twitter is a terrible, terrible place to work.

Musk has alienated many advertisers, has made no effort to win them back, and flat-out treats them with contempt. It’s hard to see advertiser revenues increasing, even when (per Elon) Twitter use is increasing, because most of those “new users” are shitposters testing the moderation boundaries, cryoptoscam accounts, and bots, not accounts advertisers are willing to pay for access to.

So there’s no reason to think revenue will increase. There’s good reason to think costs will be high. Musk is still on the hook for paying all those people he laid off for 3 months. Having slashed his staff without any plan or forethought at all, Musk will now need to turn to outsourcing just to keep the lights on (e.g. doing payroll as mentioned above) and anyone who has ever worked with outsourcing knows it’s generally more expensive per unit of completed work, not cheaper. Not having anyone around to keep the bots out means you’re paying more in server costs without an increase in the monetizable base (Musk never seems to mention that having more users is a cost to the business unless they monetize through ads or subs.) There are surely a bunch of lawsuits in the pipeline - e.g. from the people Musk falsely claimed to fire for cause, advertisers mad about impersonation, Tesla shareholders, the EU, the FTC (though technically that’s a consent decree), etc etc.

Twitter is going to bleed money, possibly forever. (It only made money in 2 years when it was run by a non-insane person, after all.) Being, at the moment, the richest man in the world, Musk can tank the losses, Charles Foster Kane style, unless Tesla collapses as well.

Twitter is going to become worse and worse on a technical level, because Musk has fired anyone who could make it better, scared away any new talent, and left it operating on a shoestring.

And Twitter is going to become a hellscape of Musk sycophancy and right-wing bile, because Musk has made it perfectly clear that’s what he wants out of a social network.

That’s what the future holds for Twitter. You can see why some people wish it had crumbled to dust overnight instead.

I will take that bet.

Stakes?

I enjoy the BBC world service commentator this morning signing off with:

“You can find us on twitter at […]. Well, at least for as long as twitter lasts.”

Good post, but this was unfair:

He at least thought firing 50% would make for a sickkk Elon-as-Thanos snap meme. Maybe with the infinity stones replaced with emeralds.

For sure - Elon likes the general attention, good or bad, and only selectively targets people. He seems squarely in the Howard Stern zone and digs it (i.e., x million people tweet in to support you, but 2x people tweet in because they hate you = higher twitter usage and attention…profit!!!)

Didn’t Shiva already get suspended for criticizing Musk?

If the moderation team is at best a skeleton crew (and was almost certainly understaffed before), does it matter if something that would require contextual analysis (ie: not easily automated) isn’t allowed?

Ironically I think the best chance of a Twitter competitor/replacement really rising up is if Twitter is mostly working fine for quite a long time.

If something crazy happened and Twitter suddenly exploded, the Twitter social graph is never going to be replaced. But if Twitter sticks around and people just slowly hate it more and more, it’s possible a replacement could syphon people away over time and preserve some of the structure of user connections alive.

I’m glad Mastodon exists. I like that Mastodon theoretically encourages lots of weird experimental mini Twitters. But I don’t think it has any real shot as it is now.

HumanTon’s thesis was that it’d be done via community moderation, not professionally staffed moderation.

Of course this only works if the moderating community actually has shared norms. That’s clearly not possible given the level of polarization in the Twitter use case. If that’s their solution, it seems like the only stable solution is for the moderator pool to be seeded fairly narrow part of the spectrum, and kick out any new members that don’t align with that seed. And yes, it’s pretty obvious what kind of edgelords that initial set would consist of.

It seems plausible this is Musk’s vision, based on what he has said. I don’t think there’s any chance it is happening by Christmas just from a tech perspective.

Lol.

You are expecting there to be a moderation team to exist to ban people criticizing Musk.

Musk is banning them himself, from the looks of it.

You’re not going to get banned from Twitter for criticizing Musk. You’re going to get fired for criticizing Musk, however.