She’s competent, so she’s out.

re:

Haha, yeah, fuck you, Mooch.

Did something new happen with mooch?

It’s Mooch tweeting that pic. It’s so meta.

I was wondering if he got hired and fired again.

I still don’t understand why he’s relevant or why anybody pays any attention to him.

Currently, he’s having it back-and-forth with Cheeto Mussolini on Twitter.

I mean, he’s right.

Some of us figured this stuff out without having to work for him and support his campaign and administration first.

Trump ended up “accidently” watching the Real Time show from Friday, which had the Mooch along with some others like Tom Nichols. So Trump was going off on twitter about the Mooch, and he was responding back.

My pet theory; Scaramucci and Avenatti are going to be third-party running mates for 2020, but they haven’t agreed who’s heading the ticket yet, so they haven’t announced ;)

That’d be one step closer to President Camacho.

Indeed it would, Brian.

Ecept that would be a step up from Trump so…


That statistic seems a bit weird in its specificity. Since it’s specifically limiting it to “race based terrorism”, that seems like white supremacists would be the only ones really involved, since there isn’t really a coherent movement for some other kind of race based violence. Like, there aren’t really black supremacists.

But at the same time, the other “normal” types of terrorism that I’d expect to see, would be religion based, or potentially environmentalism based, etc. But those would naturally get excluded from the statistics here since we’re limiting it to race based only. When you look at the numbers, about half of the folks involved in domestic terrorism were white supremacists.

Clearly, white supremacists are a huge problem now, but it seems like this statistic is trying to overstate it.

It would include black people targeting white police officers.