We just had a user ID here pop up on the delete list with the name James Kirk.
…I knew it was bogus when I noticed in the ID the middle initial was T.
Yes, I know. How does that make the ID bogus?
The odds of someone really having the name of James Kirk aren’t too farfetched? But the odds of someone actually being named James T Kirk are just silly, and it’s 99% not a real user name?
Wasn’t the (literal) captain of a new Navy ship, named something Star Trek related, James Kirk?
USS Zumwalt. James A. Kirk.
Guy who bought a phone from my buddy who works at Verizon was named James T Kirk. My buddy even asked to see his ID for proof.
So, it happens!
I mean, the fictional James T. Kirk was popularized circa 1966-1969, which was 50 years ago, and is/was the subject of near-cultish fan levels of enthusiasm. The odds of some adult being named James T. Kirk are very much non-zero.
And their curse shall be that they are removed from every database.
…lo, unto the third generation.
Djscman
6080
Maybe his parents were Trekkers. That’s the danger in being born to a family with a last name like Kent, Parker, Wayne, Bond, Potter or Skywalker. Through no fault of your own, you could wind up with a name like Moonchild Kirk.
Nah, just the Next Generation.
You should be banished to a Far Point.
ponders whether to reignite the Trekkie vs. Trekker War
Great. Now I’m getting looks from coworkers.
And that’s how we wound up with a technician driving around a neighbourhood to provide service at 123 <insert prgorammer’s name here> street.
DaveLong
6088
I’m quite proud of this thread derail. :)