I try and take people at their word, but I had trouble with this one. It was hard to see a pattern of racism, or maleficence, in the protester’s complaint.
I went back to school in 2012, and so I’m somewhat familiar with the atmosphere on college campuses these days. I was also living here in Charlottesville when the Rolling Stone article was published, and when protesters started throwing cinder blocks through Phi Psi’s windows.
I have seen how mobs can operate.
Do you remember the scene in 21 Jump Street when they enter school ‘one strapping’ only to find that no-one does that anymore? And, to Channing Tatum’s bewilderment, that the socially aware nerds have become the cool kids?
21 Jump Street may describe a fictional high school, but it felt like the colleges I know. At UVa the popular kids, even your top tier houses, were heavily involved in community service programs. They built schools, tutored inner city youth, went on mission trips, and promoted sexual assault awareness. And it wasn’t about making a quota, or putting something on a resume.
It was cool to be kind.
If you’ve seen South Park recently, you’ve probably encountered PC Principle. He’s the frat bro turned uber PC activist. The character is certainly an exaggeration, but that sort of person does actually exist. There is a culture of competition where people fight to be the most socially aware - and these people leap on perceived social transgressions without mercy.
The danger I found, was that these groups started seeing transgressions in the innocuous. In their eagerness to fight injustice, they saw enemies that did not exist - and they often exaggerated problems with dodgy statistics.
Mizzou probably has it’s flaws, all schools do, but this rush to judgement … and the thin nature of the complaint, it makes me skeptical. At the very least, I think Mizzou deserves the benefit of the doubt while any charges are investigated.
–
*Travis, Mizzou Player Strike…