Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman has been removed from the White House NSC staff.

Just another lib getting cucked by daddy alpha Trump, duh

You’re doing it wrong.

-Tom

Great, now I’m going to have to start a semantic crusade against people calling Paul a libertarian. I’ve already got my hands full trying to save the word “conservative”!

-Tom

Libertarian has been a lost cause for decades.

Rand Paul most definitely did call himself a libertarian, and still does.

I think that is the point of Menzo’s statement though, pointing out the ridiculous inconsistency from Rand Paul.

Ron was mostly Libertarian. Everyone else hasn’t been close. Or been a pedophile. So many pedos.

If Donald Trump shot a man dead on Fifth Avenue, the Republicans would say he has every right to own a gun. If he were caught driving the getaway car for a bank robbery, they’d say he has every right to drive a car. There really is no bottom.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/d1/45/45d14501d3de80c85fc862de76c59a15.jpg

His confessions for all the crimes he’s been doing hasn’t reached a wide enough audience yet.

From listening to NPR this morning, it sounds like Republicans are finally coalescing on a strategy and that is to say that if he was asking for a Quid Pro Quo and withholding aid to investigate a political rival, then that’s not okay, that’s an impeachable offense. But if he was asking for a Quid Pro Quo and withholding aid in order to investigate corruption, and the company being investigated coincidentally just happens to be working with Hunter Biden, then that’s perfectly okay and not an impeachable offense.

This is a good strategy, finally. Because this way they can admit to all the facts in evidence and still say with a straight face (somehow) that it’s not an impeachable offense.

So apparently “Biden” is just a synonym for “corruption?” I’m pretty sure he mentioned Biden by name. Did he even use the word corruption in the call?

In the one call with the memo, “Biden” was not actually said. There is a dispute over whether or not the company in question, Burisma, was specifically mentioned.

Eh?

I like how the President doesn’t even know what her name is.

Haha. Welp. There it is, I guess.

They’re letting women have names now?

I was coming here to quote that, Ginger beat me to it! :)

I particularly like the “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution” part. So, I suppose Trump has that on tape?

And here’s the issue that House Democrats will need to hammer on in open testimony.

That in this thread – where ostensibly people who follow this thing fairly closely are posting – there are those who think that this is a “good strategy”. Because, if you’ve paid much attention at all, you know that it really fucking isn’t.

We’ve now had 3 separate witnesses – none of whom are radical leftist Democrats – testify that the condition on turning over funds was predicated on Zelensky going to a podium and specifically saying three words: “Biden”, “Investigation” and “Clinton”. And that the source on this went straight to Trump himself.

I expect this will be emphasized a lot in the coming weeks.