Yes, my worry too. Aging Trump may decide that a world without him in it is a world that no one else should be alive in either. The guy’s ego is that crazy.
So WaPo is reporting that the ‘no quid pro quo’ call between Sondland and Trump maybe never happened?
Here’s that link (though the Post has been upping their paywall game lately)
Oghier
4513
Rudy arriving at the White House:

That’s amusing. You attempt to explain away unlawful behavior with a metaphor that refers to unlawful behavior. I guess that’s the world these people live in – bunch of liars and grifters.
Typically fine sleuthing here from Susan.
Other than Sondland still lying, even on the 3rd try and even while implication Trump - is there a deeper significance to this? We know that even if the “No quid pro quo” call did happen it was after Trump knew that congress knew or would soon know.
Meanwhile, yet another GOP former member of congress claims that there are many who secretly hate Trump. Yawn.
barstein
4520
Edit: pasted the wrong set of links, my bad.
Next defense? No quid pro quo pro bono.
Alstein
4523
Could Roberts if it was really bad just declare the senate’s actions to be the Chief Justice’s domain and declare the Senate actions unconstitutional without appeal?
Everything I’ve read says or implies that the Senate could vote to overrule Roberts. I don’t really grasp the procedure for that. I suppose McConnell asks to be recognized and tells Roberts he wants to take a vote.
Anybody have a good summary of the Clinton trial in the Senate, with enough detail to understand the procedure?
Edit: This is a bit helpful:
“Updated his testimony.”
Fucking criminals and traitors, the lot of them.
Ain’t no guillotine dull enough.
RichVR
4526
Ain’t no firing squad bright enough
Ain’t no rope tight enough
Ain’t no gas choking enough
To keep you from going to hell…