Good guess, but not the Blues Brothers.

Ghostbusters 2?

Fletch

Strange Brew?

Between dtolman, Ginger_Yellow, and BennyProfane, one of you is really, really close. But none of you have closed the trap.

Ghostbusters (2016)

Correct!

  • There’s nothing in the frames

One of the best gags in the movie, where the doofus heartthrob receptionist reveals he only wears glasses to resemble a smart person, but his glasses’ frames hold no lenses.

  • Later, the producers of the movie wondered why no one was picking up the phone

Marketing rebranded Ghostbusters (2016) to Ghostbusters: Answer The Call (2016), trying to get the home video market to be more enticing to call center workers, receptionists, and fans of Joseph Campbell.

  • it’s not a wholly original story|

It’s kind of a reboot! Peppered with several winking glances to the earlier movies.

  • one deleted scene shows up in the credits

So there was a big setpiece with a ton of choreography, but for pacing reasons or something, it was cut and played over the end credits.

  • There’s a really terrific collection of talent in the cast, so much so that the cameos give off a confusing effect.

You’ve got your Bill Murray, your Dan Aykroyd, your Ernie Hudson, your Sigourney Weaver and Annie Potts, not to mention other funny folks like Jared from Silicon Valley and Matt Walsh from Veep, UCB, the Daily Show (etc.). The Ghostbusters vets tell the viewer, “hey, remember the earlier movies we were in? The catchphrases, the memorable characters and situations? Despite those callbacks, try not to compare this movie to that movie, though. This is a reboot!” But Ghostbusters (2016) was a lot like Jurassic World (2015). Jurassic Park wasn’t a comedy, but it was a certainly a crowd-pleaser, and that implies some comic relief. Ghostbusters (1984) was more of an outright comedy, but like Jurassic Park, it also came from the tradition of the 1970s disaster movie. Answer The Call and ‘World were a fine enough ideas for movies, proven talent were gathered to make them manifest, and everyone obviously sweated over them to make them funny and dazzling. They also had enormous budgets relative to their predecessors. Also, neither were likely to exist except that their predecessors still hold such a grasp on moviegoers’ imaginations that they provided a built-in audience. Is that bad? I dunno, I’d rather re-watch Answer The Call than Ghostbusters 2, and Jurassic World over Jurassic Park 3, but neither of the newer movies feel as authentically pleasing as the originals.

  • The movie’s director has a certain sartorial affectation, but there’s no rule you have to wear sweats and t-shirts to direct a film

Paul Feig, who made his bones as a producer and writer on the wonderful Freaks and Geeks back in the day, apparently went all in on becoming a clotheshorse. This is a typical picture of him, and apparently he dresses up this way on set, too.

  • The main actors had all hosted or starred in Saturday Night Live

Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, Kate McKinnon are or were bright spots on the show, and Melissa McCarthy did great when she hosted (and did a recurring role as then-press secretary Sean Spicer). (No one asked, but the misogynistic backlash to the casting news of a Ghostbusters reboot — but with women! — really pissed me off. All these actors were terrific with their own energy. Their gifts didn’t quite gel compared to the chemistry of the four guys from the original movie but, first, that’s not necessarily a problem, and second, that’s pretty far down on the list of setbacks that kept this movie from being among the best movies of its year. I could go on at length, but this is lengthy enough.)

Anyway, well done, @KWhit. You’re up!

I love the Lady Ghostbusters movie - at least until the 3rd act, I guess.

I’ll have the next movie up soon.

Are you sure that picture of Paul Feig isn’t a still from The Kingsman?

Ha, that gives me an idea for a terrible Frankenstein-like horror movie. What if clothes really did make the man?

Next Up:

  • An autobiographical story
  • Blood in the water
  • Missing charts
  • Car accident
  • A chance meeting in a club ultimately leads to the climax

Nothing jumps to mind, but I’m thinking that final clue might make this an easy one.

Could have been Gaspard Noe’s Love, as his following movie was Climax.

Not Love, @Buckaroo.

You might be right, but what could it be? Mama Seal: The True Tail Of A Mother’s Thirst For Revenge?

With the autobiopic angle and the blood in the water clue, I’m guessing Soul Surfer, the one about the young surfer who suffered her arm being bit off by a shark. But I haven’t seen it so I don’t know if there were charts or car accidents.

Not Soul Surfer. New clue below.

And I’m amending one of the clues, as this is definitely fiction, but has autobiographical elements.

  • Autobiographical elements to the story
  • Blood in the water
  • Missing charts
  • Car accident
  • A chance meeting in a club ultimately leads to the climax
  • Musical chairs

Ah ah! This thing was on the TVs of the ferry l took last week (without sound obviously). l didn’t even know the title before you mentioned it. lt looked so bad, clearly made for TV. Dennis Quaid and Helen Hunt “star” in it.

Geez, showing a movie on a boat about someone getting bit by a shark is a little like showing Alive on a plane!

Could the movie be Ray?

Sorry. Not Ray. I’ve never seen that movie. Was it any good?

I dunno, I only saw Rock Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, La Bamba, and Great Balls of Fire, so I assume it was all right.