Eh me too. Here’s my understanding:
Woman was accused of trading sex with journalists to promote her “non-game game.” 4chan got upset that the sanctity of games journalism could be corrupted by people with vaginas and they put a target on the woman’s head and harrassed her in every way you’d expect them to. It was ridiculous.
Then people’s true colors were shown when it came time to address the situation, assign blame, and figure out what the actual narrative of the battle was. For some people the issue was the overall treatment of women in gaming, while others claimed it was “about ethics is gaming journalism,” while simultaneously shitting on “women, white knights, and cucks” for bro points.
I’m totally sure this is 100% accurate and covers all the important stuff to everybody’s satisfaction.