You should also be be able to satisfy your wonderment with answers such as “Because I enjoy it,” “Entertainment is essentially just entertainment,” and my favorite, “Who cares, does anyone know how to wax that stupid Krogan near the elevator on Feros in Mass Effect?” (<–example)

Did you snap your fingers and waggle your head while you typed that?

Last I recall this thread was called Gaming Podcast Discussion. Groupthink Circlejerk Hayride is down the hall.

I’m pretty sure I specified what I disliked in the podcast, and I liked the previous two. I hope those combined facts and the sudden realization that people can have differing opinions didn’t shatter your worldview. Have some orange slices until you come down.

Braver? The guy flipping burgers at McDonalds is braver than Rohrer, and he makes more.

Bravery is accepting that you’re gonna have to do something you dislike in order to provide for your family, even the most extreme neocons tend to hold down jobs.

I forgive you.

I actually liked the witness protection bit, after my ears recovered. I knew that Metacritic scores are super important, but rendering someone unable to work in the industry? I guess it helps explain how the journalist-developer relationship can be hostile at times.

I was also a little put off by the fact that the episode was called “Why Game?” and turned into “Why Make Games?” But then again, I’m a fan of This American Life, and Ira Glass takes much bigger liberties with his themes…

Oh, the repeating “really big scrotums” bit was dumb.

And then there’s the whole, “Holy shit, the guy who made the podcast is reading this. Let me defend him while casting aspersions on the honestly held opinions and criticism of another forum poster and maybe he’ll be my best friend!”

Adree really didn’t deserve any of what you said.

I hope Robert Ashley will be my best friend. But I haven’t listened to the latest Well-Wasted yet, so I don’t expect I have much of a chance. Maybe he’ll just call me buddy and I can squeal shrilly.

I did listen to Rebel FM, and to my massive perplexedment they found the Red Faction demo to be confusing and a poor representative for the game - which is just alienspeak to me.

On the other hand, whoever played the full version (Arthur?) affirmed that the game is pretty great on the whole.

Infamous, as well, was explained to be a day-and-date purchase.

Also some interesting predictions for E3. If anyone is still listening …

I heard the whole “witness protection” interview just fine, and I’m Norwegian. Nice job Robert.

Quality of the third episode aside, Robert Ashley should be commended for trying something different within the gaming podcast space. I like snarky, sarcastic dudes ripping on games as much as anybody, but A Life Well Wasted is something that I could play for a non-gamer without feeling like an idiot.

Also, I too would like to be his best friend. Maybe we can braid each other’s hair while we playfully argue about which Guided By Voices album is the best.

Hmmmm…I strongly suspect that we couldn’t be best friends if that was going to be the topic of conversation, because I would contend Do the Collapse is the best and I’m told that any GbV fan would then be required to murder me to death.

Working on ALWW as I type this. Bitching/Praise to come, I guess.

Hey, man, my favourite is Isolation Drills. Indie cred: DESTROYED.

Ooookay - I kind of get where the critics are coming from. I hate Jason Rohrer preemptively myself because he is a hippy, and thus a criminal moron, because I fall into the Penn and Teller school of thought that most crunchy stuff these days outside of walking around with your tits out is pretty much grade A stupid, and the reporter really needs to get a room with his New God Among Men. I don’t like the non-critical way in which his lifestyle was examined because I think there’s a lot of criticism to be made there.

That said, this is the video game show that would be on NPR if there were a video game show on NPR - what did you expect? And really, there’s a little bit of the Zuckerberg problem here. I remember last year when the entire Twitter mafia wanted to slaughter that reporter and dance in her blood for basically flirting with the guy for an hour on stage, but it’s not like you could drag Jason here into a room and then attempt to castrate him for not putting a diaper on his kid or letting his wife die of asthma in the name of his “ideals” (the problem here being that it’s totally cool to have ideals when they’re you know, right, but sustainable anything is so far from correct that doing any harm to anybody in the name of it is like holding a benefit concert for Nazis). That’s not an interview I think he would want to give, and while I might enjoy listening to it, that’s more because it’s stroking the things I already know rather than introducing me to things I don’t.

Of course, none of that excuses interviewing the mother fucking MCP for the last fifteen minutes of the program. The voice effects kind of drug down this episode, and that’s the one technical note that I’d take away from this if I were producing it. When it interferes with listening (it does - seriously, I have to try hard just to understand what’s being said for that segment), you’ve got a problem on your hands.

That said, even the weakest episode so far of ALWW still beats out a lot of the other programming out there, and I’m not going to try and crucify Robert for trying to do something different. This particular experiment with vocal effects failed, which is bad, but I don’t hate it for the uncritical address of Rohrer, because that wasn’t really the point the show was trying to make, so, you know, whatever. 8.1 out of 10.0?

Edit: Oh, and every human that intends to attempt a phone interview or conference into podcast transition needs to talk to Russ Roberts at EconTalk and figure out how it is that he does it so well, because almost every one of his shows is an interview by phone and they’re all imminently listenable (well, if you like academic economics talk, but my point is that it’s good audio quality).

I didn’t really think I was defending Ashley or attacking Adree, just pointing out that there’s a difference between venting on a forum about something, and venting on a forum where the creator of that something sees it and responds.

I haven’t actually listened to the latest ALWW. It might suck.

I do like the Chuck Norris .gif, though.

I think other podcasts could do better if they edited their content like Robert Ashley. That might mean less content, which is is a-okay, because there’s a lot of other podcasts to fill the time.

I hope in the future you do not criticize my posts then, as the creator of them I would be hurt.

I think, in the future, you should just have an actor friend read a transcript of the interview for you. That way it sounds normal, and it isn’t using the guy’s real voice.

I always entertained the idea of doing a podcast interview with the other person rendered via MacInTalk, a la AUTO from Wall-E. Good thing I never followed through!

How about using AutoTune, next time?

Talk to his sound production guy, I have a months-long backlog, but I recall him crediting his sound engineer each episode for a long while. The info isn’t on the site, alas.

I really don’t understand all this trouble with the “witness protection program” filter on the last interview. My hearing is terrible, a side effect of standing near the speakers at too many concerts. I was playing Far Cry 2 the entire time I listened to the episode, so I wasn’t exactly giving it my full attention. I had not even the tiniest bit of trouble understanding what that guy was saying.

I’m getting through the second episode of Out of the Game (yeah, I know I’m way behind) and it’s somewhat enjoyable. I absolutely love listening to N’Gai Croal and he’s above reproach as far as I’m concerned.

I thought Shawn Elliott’s take on John Mellencamps’ song “Small Town” was a barely concealed shot at religion, particularly Christianity as the portions he primarily cited from the song had to do with references to religious beliefs. That’s certainly his right, but it bugs me when people that obviously consider themselves intellectuals feel the need to take the piss out of other people’s belief systems. Moreover, he did so under the guise of criticizing the song as vapid pop music, though I couldn’t help noticing the lines he selected as particularly bad were those concerning religion.

I’m not through the entire episode yet, but Luke Smith has been essentially absent through everything I’ve heard so far. I’m not sure if he’s extremely disinterested (and if so, why he bothers doing it) or just can’t get a word in edgewise. When he did finally choose to speak it was to crap all over the OnLive service. Now I have no idea how viable that service will ultimately be, but it seems unfair to compare it to the Phantom as OnLive was actually shown to be working at GDC.

Speaking of absent, someone on the podcast thinks so little of it that his constant typing can be heard behind other people’s talking. Not only annoying for the listener, but very rude to whoever is speaking. Also, there’s a portion where one of the hosts is talking (it might’ve been N’Gai) and you can hear instant messaging sounds clanging over what he’s trying to say. Again, fundamental disrespect for one’s fellow podcaster.

Finally, I thought it was hilariously ironic for Shawn Elliott to get his panties in a bunch regarding Dave Perry’s “Lunch with Luminaries”. For those that missed the podcast, N’Gai explained that the lunch is something organized during GDC where various gaming luminaries (including Will Wright and Rob Pardo) are brought together for lunch and discussion along with a handful of journalists. The journalists don’t participate with questions, but instead (according N’Gai’s description anyway) listen and document the event as they see fit. Elliott had a problem with the use of the word luminaries and guffawed the whole thing off as ridiculous. He seemed to be offended that Perry had the audacity and ego to assume that anyone would want to listen to and report on lunch conversation between heavy hitters in the industry.

And here’s where the irony comes in. Isn’t Elliott the guy that organized an email SYMPOSIUM, in which we all essentially eavesdropped on conversations between big names from the enthusiast press (among others) regarding the state and practice of games journalism? Is it just me, or is this almost exactly the same thing as Perry’s “Lunch with Luminaries” only with games press folks substituted for big name developers? It astounded me that Elliott could take such a dismissive attitude toward Perry’s event without realizing he himself had done pretty much the same thing.