Goodbye overtime

Erik’s got a point-the truth of the matter probably isn’t told completely through the EPI, one of the more left-leaning Washington think tanks, but I really doubt that anyone still working for the Labor Department under Bush (read: advanced cognitive dissonance required) is telling the full truth either.

The real kicker, if you look at longstanding GOP anitlabor trends, is the reclassification of the workers more than the overtime pay changes. It’s a divide and conquer approach to making unions irrelevant-if you make more of them “managers” to the point at which the number of classified “workers” cannot form a reasonable bargaining unit, then you starve the unions of their worker pool. The GOP has been working hard to marginalize unions through the executive branch since 1980.

The increased eligibility for lower-paid workers seems like a smokescreen coating than anything else. Businesses, especially ones lacking large union presence (such as retail), can by and large finesse that group into not working overtime because, by and large, the workforce is largely replaceable-just staff up and optimize toward the 40 hour week. The reclassified groups are more skilled, more critcal, and less replaceable-and likely require more personnel investment and pay. Exempt them and you can get more out of them for less.

This amendment stinks, even if you look at it from the centrist perspective.

Guess what takes effect Monday!

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/08/20/ot/index.html

God damn it.

sniff! I…I…think I’m gonna cry :lol:

Hey, maybe the solution is more taxes! Keep overtime and tax it at 75%!

http://www.thecarolinachannel.com/money/3669681/detail.html

This doesn’t sound so bad:

[b]TheCarolinaChannel.com
Fact Sheet: Overtime 101
Information About New Federal Laws On Overtime Pay
NEW LAW

The new federal law on overtime pay goes into effect Monday, August 23.
The Labor Department refers to the changes as the “FairPay” rules.

OVERALL - WHO DOES IT HELP? WHO DOES IT HURT?

There is significant disagreement about how many people the changes will affect.
The Labor Department says as many as 107,000 workers could lose overtime eligibility but about 1.3 million will gain it.
However, the Economic Policy Institute – a liberal Washington think tank – says 6 million people will lose overtime and only a few will gain it.
The law comes after decades of lobbying by business groups facing major lawsuits about overtime.
Among those are: Wal-Mart, Starbucks, Radio Shack, Rite Aid and Bank of America.
Labor Secretary Elaine Chao says the new rules will help stop needless litigation because they clarify who’s entitled to overtime.

OVERTIME 101

The 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act set the current standards for pay and overtime and covers about 115 million workers.
That law requires employers to pay no less than minimum wage $5.15/hour for all hours worked.
For every hour worked above 40 hours in single workweek, the law mandates that employers pay one-and-a-half times the regular rate of pay.
But, that law has always had exemptions for certain professions and classes of workers – meaning some employers do not have to pay time-and-a-half.

WHO GAINS OVERTIME UNDER NEW LAW

Workers earning $23,660 or below automatically must receive overtime now. That raises the income bar.

WHO COULD LOSE OVERTIME UNDER NEW LAW

White-collar workers earning $100,000 or more a year.
In addition, people from a number of professions identified as generally exempt from overtime: pharmacists, dental hygienists, physician assistants, accountants, chefs, athletic trainers with degrees or specialized training, computer system analysts, programmers and software engineers, funeral directors, embalmers, journalists, financial services industry workers, insurance claims adjusters, human resource managers, management consultants, executive and administrative assistants, purchasing agents and registered or certified medical technologists.
Employers are told to make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

NURSES

Registered nurses who are paid on an hourly basis should receive overtime.
Those who are paid on a salaried basis, earning more than $455 a week, no longer have to be paid overtime under federal law.

EMERGENCY WORKERS AND UNIONS

Emergency workers (including police, firefighters and rescue personnel) will continue to get overtime. The new law clearly states those workers cannot be exempted from overtime.
Union workers covered by contracts will not be affected by the change. But organizers say the new rules will make bargaining more difficult when contracts come up for renewal.[/b]

I do wonder if this will get flipped back to a previous state (or, even better, completely amended to be in favor of workers instead of companies) if Kerry/someone other than Bush gets elected.

I do have a feeling that a lot of people don’t know that this was being changed, and that of those who do, some of the people who make salary just don’t care. It doesn’t affect them, why bother with it? That sort of mentality.

Those who do know, and are affected, are going to be mighty damned mad, though (unless it affects them in a positive way, note: I’m not for/against it).

It would be very amusing to see people quitting by the thousands in a massive pro-worker demonstration. I believe that would get noticed. That would get things changed. If every single person who opposed these rule changes were to suddenly quit/picket, I think you’d find that things would change rather quickly.

Too bad most people can’t/won’t be so daring.

This isn’t news.

It isn’t news until someone complains about not getting their overtime… or something like that.

Chet

Some interesting arguments here, but in the end, if someone needs their job, they’re going to stick around. On the flipside, I can see companies hiring additional staff to minimize the automatic overtime for people making under $23.6k a year. In most places that pay that much it’s hard to get enough hours to qualify for health insurance (usually 30 to 35, depending) as it is.

Definately seems like the issue is undercovered.

Does anyone think that this is hurting people who would tend to vote for Bush instead of against him?

Wait, that Carolina Channel article is directly in conflict with what you guys are complaining about. Are cops et al taken off overtime?

I guess we’ll find out monday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5954011/

Sweet, the House blocked 'em!

Clearly those 20 Republicans who voted with the Dems are TRAITORS and in league with TERRORISTS!

Yeah I was just reading that. It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out. I’m curious if the White House will just let it drop now.