Oh, so this is only 7 billion, until some larger deal can be reached.
Yeah, so… they’re gonna run out of money basically instantly.

Yeah. The deal negotiated will take about two weeks to a month to be implemented and made specific. These are bridging funds to keep the banks afloat till the deal is finalized (seems like it will, but I don’t write off a backpedal ping either).

I buy greek olive oil (as long as it’s organic!) and feta, to help out. I draw the line at Ouzo.

And in a further indication of the politics involved, the bridging loan has had to write in cast-iron guarantees for EU but non-Euro members to avoid seriously p!ssing them off by asking them to bail out someone elses currency

I absolutely concur. It’s one thing to say someone is wrong or ignorant, it’s quite another to impugn his intellectual honesty just because you don’t like the points he’s making which contradict your understanding of something.

Oh look, my little fan club is following me around :)

How’s being petty and childish working out for you?

Juan disagreed with hard statistics, using anecdotal evidence from Spain and saying ‘Greece might be the same as my completely non verifiable Spanish experience therefore you are wrong’.

That is intellectually disingenuous at best, and dishonest at worst. It continues a long running trend on thread where, when confronted with hard evidence, Juan either reframes the argument or answers with a very long post about ideology or culture or something equally unempirical and unsubstantiable(not a word, but close enough). Juan quite clearly wants to believe a narrative, and alters reality, facts and creates fiction to make that narrative correct. Pretty standard and pretty human, but also pretty obvious. I could quite easily list 10 examples of him doing that in replies to me alone, never mind to others.

Indeed, Papageno was guilty of the very same thing. He had a narrative, that of ‘the American way is the only way’. When confronted with statistics, links and articles that contradicted that, he quickly retreated and completely altered the thrust of his argument while keeping the end target the same. It is disingenuous to ‘discuss’ when, no matter what evidence someone presents, you will never reconsider your belief and opinion.

Not that I would expect either of you to be either capable of or willing to understand that, given your posting history. Thank you for your valuable contributions, I look forward to you popping up on another thread as you continue to follow me and take puerile potshots.

Sure, buddy. Okay. That’s…one way to view your interactions with the forum.

Anyway, RETORTED.

All of that is completely and irrefutably true if you assume that there is a 0% chance that anything you post can be wrong. Do you assume that?

Or even talked about

I probably shouldn’t be engaging, but… Did you read my reply to your post? There was data and hard statistics there that disagreed with your interpretation of your other hard statistics, and confirmed my not-data driven initial assumption (which was lucky, since it was an assumption, like I conceded as I was making it, and could have been wrong). Or that at least showed the issue is far more complex that you were making it.

I agree that I sometimes assume personal anecdote to be extrapolable between Spain and Greece, but that’s something I do in earnestness. While data and statistics are important, statistics can also be not the end to all knowledge, specially if you only take part of the numbers (point in case is bringing up self-employment numbers without looking at how that self-employment is structured and what it really means on the ground). Let’s say that when looking at people and behaviours a purely numerical analysis might fall sort of properly explaining certain dynamics. I first came to realize this when I first moved to the USA. Even though I had read lots of data and being exposed (and avidly consumed) their media, once I got there I realized I had absolutely no idea what the experience of an American really was. After living there for 6 years I now think I had a better (albeit still wholly incomplete) idea, and can therefore understand much better where many people in this forum are coming from. Experience is an important part of human thought, and I can’t dismiss it so thoroughly in favor of data when we are talking issues of psychology, motivation and expected behavior (when we are discussing climate change, for example, then data rules). Numbers sometimes don’t allow us to understand people.

Statistics and data are an useful tool, but saying things like that Greeks are voting just because they don’t want to pay more taxes instead of being a more complex interrelation of personal wants and ideology is simplistic (I linked Donald Tusk before, when he raises his concerns on the rising of ideology you deny that exists). Similarly, saying that a huge number of self-employed means a huge number of struggling businesses is denying the Greek reality (looking at the data I brought up that confirms my initial intuition). Both of those assumption make an incorrect use of statistics and data, either refusing to look further in once they make your point (self-employment structure) or just using non-applicable data (saying that polls on ideological engagement I the UK in the 70s and 00s applies to the Greek situation).

Of course, intuition and/or observation has the pretty big drawback that you can get something wrong. And I do get many things wrong and im happy to be proven so. But our main points of contention (the rising ideological drive of voting in the EU and Greece and the work ethic of Greek people) are not something that can be resolved through mere hard statistical analysis. You need to decide what you feel is happening, because there’s just not good enough and not contradictory data out there. You are frustrated I’m not convinced, but to get me to your side you would need to prove it with either really good and recent data or with a more holistic argument. I’m not saying it can’t happen, just that it didn’t yet.

One thing I do ask, though. Read my posts before attacking me. You keep saying I don’t address Greece’s structural and industrial issues, or that things like tax evasion are not a huge problem, while I keep addressing them in many posts (we might disagree in what a small amount of those issues are, but not that they are there and are important). Similarly, don’t read in my posts more than what I actually really say. Like most people (all people) I hold somewhat complex and sometimes contradicting beliefs. Some of the stuff you imply I say I’m not saying at all. In a way, it seems you have formed in your head an image of what I think or I represent for you, and you are engaging that image instead of my posts.

What really baffles me is that your reply came from a reply I was doing to a post by Realmk, yet you focused on my posting style. That bothers me, the guy succeeded in his intention, it seems.

Good. While Kedaha is focused on attacking this Jack Raigada person, he will not notice me and my rise to power.

Only when I become the Earth Emperor he will notice me, but it will be too late.

I like Juan Raigada post for many reasons, I don’t know if I am biased to like his posting style. Maybe theres nothing wrong with Kedaha style except attacking Juan person. We are here to discuss ideas, not people.

Who is Kedaha, anyway? Is he a fan of capitalism, a member of the triads in Honk-Kong. Maybe he is the head member of a small familiar company that manufacture USA flags. Or he is a small journalist in Washington, routinely invited by Fox News has expert on Mediterranean Economies?

I can’t create a convincing attack on him without knowing much. Are you pro-workers?, do you consider Public Transport a form of communism?

As we speak, I am sending to the USA continent my spies.

Department of Homeland Security to all TSA and INS agents: Emergency Dispatch Code Mauve. Repeat Code Mauve. This is not a drill.

Tom needs to make a separate forum where only Teiman is allowed to post, so we can go there and read them whenever we want.

This is the best.

I was serius.

First finding of my spies:

Ice is free on many USA gas stations. I am surprised by that, because here in europe if you try to buy Ice in a gass station, they will use the oportunity to try to scam you 2€ or mayb 5€ of your money.

It seems USA is a rich country and even poor people is so rich that stuff that cost money in other countries, is free there.

I have not seen any movie or book talk about this. Is one of these things you only discover with people on the terrain.

I completely agree with Juan on this. Is one thing to read statistics, but these are meaningless if you don’t visit the place and see for yourselve what the numbers actually mean.


It was not my interest to interrupt this discussion, really. So please go on and discuss more about economy, I think you guys have made a very interesting thread.

In the US, soft drinks/tea are often free refill, so restaurants want more ice in them. It’s also served cold and not warm.

Yeah, the cost of the ice is amortized into the cost of the drink you’re buying. Most deli’s (at least around here) will charge you 50 cents or so if you want just a cup of ice.

Teiman has saved another thread. :P