Cheers for knocking the game... it really is the same formula, same enemies, same plots, same pace... BUT WAIT, THERE'S A NEW VEHICLE... A BIG CARRIER THING! SEE? IN THE PIC!
Anyway... Halo is a fun game to play, but each release is the same old same old. Very little has changed since the first release, ten (or more) years ag o.
On one hand, there's those who say "if it ain't broke", but on the other, lots of us have outgrown the formula, and even the nostalgia part is wearing off.
I wonder how legit this site is in comparison to other gaming websites. I question whether or not this guy actually played the game yet. He's the only reviewer here. LOL.
I love how he compares Mass Effect 3 (a third-person RPG shooter) to Halo 4 (a first-person shooter). They aren't of the same genre, and Mass Effect 3 wasn't even that good; a step down from Mass Effect 2. Darkness II wasn't that good, either.
The review is biased, and it's based on his discontent/dislike for the game, rather than what the game is or has to offer as a FPS.
Good job Tom! Now someone will actually go to your little website from the metacritic page! Way to stand out at the sacrifice of your journalistic integrity!
I wanna say GALO GALO GALO ..the franchise is finished. 88 at meta LOL and this was supposed to be UC2 killer??? LOL UC2 got 150 GOTY award . this one wont even get 5
Its a bad game ..most of the reviewers including x360 fanboys like EDGE, EUROGAMER gave this shit 8/10. Had it not been an x360 game, it would got 5 from most sites. On a side note HALO 4's meta is 88 but will quickly drop to 80-85 once more non fanboy reviews are in. HALO franchise is finished :)
why would metacritic consider fanboy reviews that gave this game 10/9. The game is horrible and enemies have no AI . It is good to see people have balls to shun GAYLO franchise. It is 88 at meta ..just wait for more reviews and the game will go below 80