I feel threated!

To the extent that I care anymore, I’m more concerned about the double-edged sword. Identity politics are a joke I can laugh about until I set a foot wrong and my life is obliterated by the chattering class through viral Internet shame.

Hey, it’s not very likely, and it’s not like it keeps me up at night, but we all have our unreasonable fears.

Jeezus.

BTW, while the podcast episode is great (and terrifying, and frustrating, and unbelievably angering, and representative of literally everything wrong with rape investigations), the article it was based on was even better:

Yeah I was in a rush so I read the linked article instead of listening to the episode.

Some similar stories I’ve read:

Is “strawman” just another meme you are infected by or can you explain yourself in plain, non-jargon-laden english?

Strawman is just another word for “I’m just going to no-platform your argument by delegitimizing it”. Whenever I hear that word these days, I know the other person has nothing constructive to say.

You can’t even comprehend someone like me would vote for Bernie can you.

I even know some black bloc types who hate identity politics.

Since I’ve been doing that in all our conversations and you’re none the wiser, it would probably be a waste of time. I’m trying cryptic now.

Here’s a clue: the characterization of liberalism as Right-wing, is a Marxist trope …

This thread is no closer to making sense to me then when it started. It seem to just be about outrage about petty outrage, and not about anything of substance. Hell, this thread is in a dead heat with the Star Wars thread for the most drivel possible.

As with all these types of things, there are two possibilities: either people are hallucinating something that isn’t there, or they’re seeing something you’re missing.

The gist of it is that some of us are seeing evidence of a noticeable proportion of politics and academia (and entertainment media, referencing TFA) turning into a sort of Idiocracy with a uniform, quasi-religious ideology.

Strawman don’t exist in english?

Here in spanish a “strawman argument” is when you create a imaginary character to with you attribute some ideas, created with the purpose to have a easy target for your arguments.

Is being said here that “strawman argument” is a acceptable way to discourse?

Generally strawmans are sort of disgusting. You want to tell that people “Please address what is being said, not what you imagine people said or what other people in other place say”.

Stop with the tone policing, all these micro-aggressions are gas-lighting my strawman. Which is problematic, because it’s triggering my PTSD (self diagnosed).

Classical liberalism is right wing (laissez faire capitalism). Modern liberalism in North America is centrist, pragmatically adopting socialism where appropriate, ideally using government regulation to account for externalities and imbalances. Socialism is left wing (state control of economy).

A keen observer of history will realize that neither wing of political thought works especially well in isolation, both lead to piles of human misery. It is to the western democracy’s credit that they fairly rapidly worked to iron out the problems with classical liberalism by leavening it with socialism which both acted as a an emergency valve to vent off revolutionary feelings and resulted in a much more stable and humane society. IMHO proper working democracy is to thank for this vital flexibility.

I thought this was appropriate. I feel like gurugeorge is lumping horrible people together under a single umbrella, despite these people having little in common with the group he is attacking, or even each other.

Why are you swallowing a Marxist characterization of classical liberalism? Are you a Marxist?

gas lighting a strawman sounds like a terrible idea…

What you feel like’s happening and what’s actually happening are two different things here.

The characterization of classical liberalism is laissez-faire capitalism. Right wing or left wing is just a label for common parlance, stemming from where people sat in the French National Assembly.

Because it’s the Canadian characterization of Liberalism. And he’s a Canadian.