But they were Trump’s judges.

You mean traitors who betrayed Trump.

The line of excuses is never-ending. It’s like looking into a double mirror.

Yep. The old adage about the revolution cannot fail only be failed exists for a reason.

You might as well try to convince flat earthers that the earth is round. All the evidence shows that it’s round so they disregard all the evidence. Stupid’s gonna stupid.

It’s probably something built into human nature that goes haywire in some people. Skepticism is healthy up to a point, but it can become unhealthy.

They are literally mentally ill, that’s what. They should be seeing a doctor and probably be on some sort of medication, but instead they post on reddit all day.

I had a random encounter once with a truly paranoid person who was on permanent disability because of it. It was wild. Dude was telling me “they” were communicating with him by his broken car radio that only played static noise. He could hear morse code in it. He also said a laptop he bought had a secret internet connection he couldn’t turn off. It was being use to monitor him. So he returned it. He had a fire at his house and when the insurance adjuster came the adjuster committed 36 RICO violations. And on and on. I was surprised this guy was allowed to wander about.

Not a doctor, but that sounds like typical schizophrenia. Sadly, I don’t know of any country handles it well, because it must be hell.

So, what’s with the QAnon lady mentioned a few days ago above? The one that said that January 6 will ultimately show if Trump is 5D-chessing it or not. Surely enough, she came to a reasonable conclusion.

Ahem.

Who’s hoarding all the cans of fake tuna now?

God, these people are so stupid.

If you’re like, a really die hard conspiracy nut, I wonder how you decide what to trust and what not to. I mean, from the outside it seems totally arbitrary at best, or at worst “the crazier the better”, but I wonder what the actual thought process is. It’s probably just a gut feeling, but like, where does the gut feeling come from?

Like, you look at that and be like “man, if they said they were only going to text 3 times, I’d be out, but 7 times? That’s a number I can believe in!”

Whoever says things that they mostly already agree with and complement it. Contradictions are ignored as not important for the big picture.

Lololol

What happens if you get the message only 6 times? Do you start the revolution on 7 or after 7?

Homeopathic rules. The fewer calls, the more potent the revolution.

Since it’s “about 7 times,” I believe it might be as few as five. Four seems too few. Similarly, it could go as high as ten. Maybe even eleven. Twelve times would be too many. But I’d say if you receive the text between five and twelve times, IT IS ON (i.e. go to Emerge Broadcast).

-Tom

Painfully obvious, I’m sure. Still, I’m compelled.

If there were a vast conspiracy, then wouldn’t controlling the courts be part of it? :P

From confirmation bias. If you’ve already drunk the Kool Aid, you’re going to see things that affirm your choice to drink the Kool Aid as credible, and you’ll automatically discount conflicting information. Hell, we’re all doing it here – albeit with what seems to be pretty good reason!