Technically I guess it could count as throwing. And there is no denying her appreciation of the effort!
Scrax
3362
Take that better judgement!
+1
reminds me of the video of the girl with sprite I think it was
Mrenda
3364
If that can be dismissed as someone throwing M&Ms(sic) at a bride, why can’t the boobie women be allowed on the basis that they’re just some happy lasses jumping with joy?
Mrenda
3365
Are you sure of that? Of course the Skittles’ people will always deny it, but that’s exactly the type of ad a good viral marketing company would come up with. It’s too slick not to have been made by a pro.
If you have to ask, you probably shouldn’t browse the internet while you’re at work, much less post gifs on Qt3!
Seriously, though, if folks think that Skittles thing is truly NSFW, appeal to Scrax. I’d say his judgment is trustworthy enough that if folks complain in earnest, he’d take it down. To me, it illustrates the difference between raunchy humor – which is fine by me – and a bunch of stupid boys leering cluelessly at some woman’s breasts – which is just embarrassing.
-Tom
Mrenda
3367
I have no problem with NSFW things. If I’m on the internet in public I generally don’t open any image threads.
I just thought it funny that fully clothed boobies bouncing get deleted and implied sex and simulated ejaculation/cum shot/facial is fine. If you’re basing the difference on the level of humour/creativity that’s another thing again, also fine in my book. And just something to bare in mind when I consider what I should and shouldn’t post here.
Nope, wait, I’m retarded! Yay! :)
I see what you did there.
-Tom
Sammich
3371
At least the sweet, fruity money shot on display here takes place within the sanctified bonds of marriage.
Nope. That’s the bride and the best man. It’s all explained in my Skittles fan fiction.
I like how the last little shot of the bride’s face makes it look like the candies caught her just right to spark the gag reflex. You can’t write that shit, people.
Now I’m not one that gives a shit about such things, since I work for myself, but my wife, who works for the state, says that’s definitely not safe for work.
A bit silly that this country is so prudish, but it is.
Ha, ha! Guess it depends on the state.
Ha, ha?
I eagerly await other animated images of simulated ejaculation to find out just where the line is here. Scrax, get to work!
Did you guys think BleedTheFreak’s He-Man ejaculations weren’t safe for work? Honest question. He checked with me before posting that and I told him the only problem is that it was a pretty stale joke. It never occurred to me that implied raunchiness was as much of a problem as explicit raunchiness.
-Tom
That’s a good question. The He-Man gif is hilarious in that Beavis and Butthead kind of way, but is it safe or work? I’d probably say no but as Jasper points out, some offices are more strict than others. At my former place of employment it’s possible it would have been considered over the line (academic, since Qt3, as a gaming site, was blocked anyway).
I don’t have a problem with either image but I figured the Skittles one, maybe because it isn’t a cartoon character, would be considered too explicit.
Maybe the best way to handle this would be to alter the title of this thread to indicate it might contain NSFW images (and then make it clear this wasn’t granting license to post an endless sea of boobies or somesuch).
P.S. Scrax, I AM JUST KIDDING. (I know he’ll have fun looking, though.)
Unrelated, the dog licking then attacking the lime is also hilarious but not in that Beavis and Butthead kind of way.
EDIT: Back on topic, I give you sleepy cat:
The problem is we all know that He-Man would never jack off all over Tom Cruise. He-Man has standards. There’s the He-Man code to consider.
