Basically whoever the next Democratic president will have to abuse the fuck out of it in the exact same way Trump did it and make an agreement with Congress to back a bill in the the last 9 months before the term is up to rein in executive privilege now that they had their fun.

Given how obstructionist the Republicans were under McConnell during the Obama presidency, I would be too. I’m 100% for shoring up our checks and balances, but there are major problems when the Republicans can provide a unified obstructionist front on the Senate for any Democrat president. I think restoring the power of Congress needs to be accompanied by reforms to Congress: the elimination of gerrymandering in the House and a hard look at how well (poorly) the two Senators per state setup works with the population distribution we have today. I understand it was set up that way purposefully, but I also understand that the country is very different in 2019 than it was in 1776.

Between gerrymandering and how the Senate seats are distributed, there are signifcant institutional advantages for the Republican party. I don’t want a tyranny of the majority but what we have today is tyranny of a minority.

I will be for a tyranny of the majority when the majority is Democrats.

The problem is the Democrats may have the majority but lack control of Congress, just like we had under the Obama administration. Look at the massive hurdle the majority had to overcome in 2018 just to pick up the seats we did.

The idea that the GOP will give up what little structural advantage they have in the face of their declining constituency is laughable. It isn’t going to happen. Until they change their policies to grow their support, they’re stuck gaming the system, and that’s what they will do.

Lest this be missed in the midst of all the impeachment kerfuffle:

I interact every week with entire families who have come to the US via the refugee program. It literally saved their lives in some cases. The majority of them are anxious to find work and be productive members of society, and their children will be even more so. It’s shameful that one of the richest and most prosperous nations in the world is closing the door to tens of thousands of desperate people around the world.

It’s shameful that one of the richest and most prosperous nations in the world is closing the door to tens of thousands of desperate people around the world.

I couldn’t have said it better.

A posted a version of this essay a few years ago. In remembrance of how much America has lost as result of Trump’s shameful action regarding refugees. I’m posting a later version. (Originally posted Jan 2017 on Facebook The next year, Andy Grove’s widow, Eva, wrote a very similar article.

{Andy Grove was the legendary CEO of Intel, and a mentor from everyone from Steve Jobs,and Mark Zuckerberg to myself, and my old admin.)

Andy Grove wouldn’t be allowed in today’s America

Sixty years ago, this month. Andras Grof along with 1,715 other Hungarian refugees arrived in Brooklyn New York. I can’t claim to fully know Andy’s politics but of this, I can be certain he would be harshly critical of Trump’s action to stop admitting refugees.

Many of the marvelous remembrances of Andy Grove, I’ve read refer to him as an immigrant. Now under normal circumstance, the distinction between refugee and immigrant is just one of semantics. Sadly this is not a normal time for America regarding immigration. Simply put, an immigrant leaves their native country by choice, a refugee by necessity. Andy Grove, like millions of displaced people in Europe and the Middle East today, was a refugee. Much has been written of Andy’s remarkable, yet quintessential American story, of a 20-year-old arriving on America’s shores with $20 in his pocket, and through brains, and hard work, becoming a captain of industry, engineer, role model, mentor, philanthropist, and a mensch.

Sadly, it is impossible to believe that Andy Grove would have made it to America today. Imagine the reception a 20-year-old single male, coming from a country wracked by violence. Educated by a system the preached the dangerous of the corrupt and evil America system, and run by leaders who owed their allegiance to a large country sworn to the destruction of America, would receive today. You can substitute ISIS, Syria, Iran today for Communism, Hungary, and the Soviet Union in 1956.

How would you go about doing a background check on Andy Grove? What State Department official would take the chance of approving him? Would a Governor or Mayor have let such a potentially dangerous man into their state or city?

After all, Andy Grove could have been a spy. What a great spy he would have been, amazing discipline, brilliant, and with a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering, he would have been the perfect candidate to join fellow Hungarian refugee Edward Teller at Lawrence Berkeley Labs and work on developing atomic weapons. This isn’t as preposterous as it seems since in all likelihood the Soviet Union did slip in a couple of spies among the 200,000 Hungarian refugees.

We shouldn’t forget that commie spies in 1956, were as feared as terrorists in 2016. They had stolen weapon plans, infiltrated our government and intelligence agencies. 1956 even had its own demagogue: Senator Eugene McCarthy. McCarthy was finding communist spies and commie sympathizers in government, entertainment, and business. Like today’s demagogue, facts weren’t important, guilt by association was all that was needed.

Our parents and grandparents weren’t stupid, they understood the potential danger of letting in a large number of refugees from a communist country like Hungary and in latter years, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, and Vietnam and others. Yet their reaction was totally different than today. In 1956, a Republican President, Eisenhower, tripled the number of Hungarian refugees accepted and 40,000 out of 200,000 ended up moving to the US. The most of any country. A comparable number today would be over 1 million Syrian refugees, a hundred-fold increase over the 10,000 proposed by the Obama administration.

They also admitted these refugees into the USA remarkably fast. Somehow it is supposed to be a feature that it takes the State Department at least 18 months to “vet” a refugee. The Andy Grove that I knew wouldn’t have waited around 18 months in a refugee camp for some bureaucrat to decide his fate, he would have gone to another country or figured some other way out. It took Andy about a month from the time he crossed the border into Austria to setting foot in New York. Nor was his story unique 75% of the Hungarian refugees were resettled in 10 weeks. All this was done, without cell phones, personal computers, or transatlantic jet flights.

The previous generation also understood what we seemingly have forgotten. A government or group which, rapes the women, executes and imprisons the men, indoctrinates their children, and generate such fear the people flee their long-time homes, tends to be just a tad unpopular.

Andy Grove hated communism. The one time I saw the man genuinely mad was when communism came up during a lunch conversation. A hatred that is shared by every immigrant or refugee, I’ve ever met from a communist country. I recently had drinks, with an Iranian engineer he talked about how desperate he and his educated friend were to get out of Iran, and sensed the same hatred of Islamic theocracies that Andy had of communism. I have no doubt that a vast number of refugees of Syrian refugees will have a hatred of Assad and ISIS, that far exceeds that of Americans. These refugees are future allies, not our adversaries.

In 1957, the International Rescue Committee,(IRC) gave Andy Grove $300 ($2,500 today) to buy hearing aids. The trust and generosity amazed Andy at the time, but I think it is quite possibly one of the best investment ever made. The generosity of the IRC and the American people at the time wasn’t the potential for future economic gains (although economic benefits of America from refugees and immigrants are immense) but rather because it was the right thing to do.

America not only survived but prospered by allowing refugees without extreme vetting for almost her entire history. Yes, there is a risk that a terrorist or three will slip in. But for every person hurt, there is score who will be helped. I know that for myself, my Intel colleagues, Silicon Valley, the country, and the world would be a far worse place if extreme vetting was in place in 1956.

Good piece. I wonder if America will be able to find its way again, and if as many people will still want to come here.

As long as the people that have the power, have the bulk of the wealth, have the privilege of being heard at every table while everyone else fights for the one seat, and are able to point at another group and say you’d have more if it wasn’t for this other group that has very little I’d rather help, or this other group that is taking from what is leftover, it’s going to be very difficult to change anyone’s mindset.

This country is so fucked right now. We need to undo all of the damage, if we can.

I don’t put much trust in the CBP but it sounds like there’s probably a lot more to this story than accidentally driving across the border. All that cash plus being denied travel visas beforehand (though I didn’t see when this actually happened) seems a bit strange.

Do you not carry $16,000 in cash with you when you’re on vacation? I thought everyone did.

That amount would have needed to be declared to Customs on crossing the border, and that is not a new rule from the last few years. Seems rather unusual, as you noted.

This page has a video/streetview of the “border” in question. Does seem fishy that they’d get on the wrong side simply to avoid an animal, plus CBP claims to have a video of their crossing.

This related story linked in the Post seems less reasonable, but it’s older news.

Uh, there are a couple really important points in this story.

U.S. authorities disputed the family’s version of events, saying they were spotted via video surveillance “slowly and deliberately driving through a ditch onto Boundary Road in Lynden, Washington” between parallel roadways on the U.S. and Canadian sides. The roads are not connected by cross streets, and the only legal way to traverse between the countries is at staffed border stations throughout the region.

In a statement, CBP said U.S. agents also determined that two of the family members had applied for travel authorization to visit the United States and were denied. A senior CBP official said the Connorses applied for visa waivers last year, and it was not immediately clear why they were rejected. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the case, said the family — four adults and three small children — were in possession of $16,000 in cash at the time of their arrest

So this family applies for a visa waiver and gets rejected, which I imagine is SUPER rare for UK travelers. Then they travel to Canada and allegedly sneak into the US with $16k in cash? That’s some shady shit.

Well if the cash was US dollars vs Canadian dollars, then they obviously crossed on purpose. $16k seems excessive, but it’s 7 people. When I travel I can carry $1-2k per person if I foresee I won’t have access to ATMs. So I would be willing to buy that if it cash C$.

As for customs rules, if the cash is divided between people, you don’t have to declare that amount. I think it’s $10k or over you have to declare? But that’s on a per person basis.

But I agree it sounds shady.

They were in Canada, not some jungle. UK citizens can easily get to their cash as needed there.

When I traveled to NYC this summer I carried $2K in person, per person, to cover for most expenses over the 2 weeks. International ATM fees are outrageous, in the order of 5-10% once you include currency conversion at bank rates. We saved about $400 by going with cash.

Not any more, not at all.

Fair enough. But there’s definitely something else going on here. Whatever these two were going to do with the $16k (which certainly could be legal), they didn’t just accidentally find themselves in the US. So they’re lying about that.

Edit: not to say I’m comfortable with their descriptions of our holding facilities, either. If that part is also true, then there’s work to be done. Even people who commit crimes have rights.