Timex
3054
The problem isn’t criticizing other Democrats.
The problem is saying you would rather have Trump win than a democrat who isn’t progressive enough, because you believe it will somehow bring in the Apocalypse and then we can have some kind of socialist rapture.
Nesrie
3055
Hillary Clinton is not running for President.
If he can’t handle someone who isn’t even running for president, then he sure as hell isn’t ready and can’t handle Trump.
Menzo
3056
I hadn’t thought about these types of people like this before, but it makes a lot of sense. Like evangelicals, what they ultimately want is destruction, and don’t care what we have to go through to get there.
“Bernie Bros” = Corbynistas.
Many of Corbynista Cult are now returning to their natural parties refusing to ever vote Labour again because its going to be lead by “neocons/right wingers” now Corbyns finally going to fuck off and someone capable is going to be running it at again. Labour forums are far more pleasant now they’ve fucked off back to ChapoTrapHouse and whatever ever Trot hellholes they dwell in.
It’s just what the hard left do. Dont be surprised by it. The US faction is tiny but noisy on socmedia and not even representative of Bernie supporters, and hopefully small enough not to effect the election. if there’s loads of then they could fuck you over by voting Green or something though, don’t dismiss it. These people destroyed the UK opposition.
Aceris
3059
criss thread sniping is against forum rules. Can we have this discussion on the thread it was happening in please.
I’m sorry? All the points I raised in relation to opposition to Sanders have been expressed on twitter and, primarily, reddit (/r/politics to be precise.) Some of that has been repeated here in any number of threads. I think it’s apropos of the (valid) point that Timex raised. [And I’m making these observations as someone who isn’t even going to vote for Sanders next week.]
However, if the mods feel I’m breaking the rules and my post is inappropriate, either they can delete or I will gladly delete it myself.
Aceris
3061
There was a discussion of Bernie’s socialism, and people not voting for him because of it, on another thread yesterday. But apparently you’d rather attack a straw man constructed from twitter posts we haven’t seen.
Several years I read this book “a billion wicked thoughts” Neuroscientist analyzed a billion+ google searches about sex and porn. Among the many surprising factoids was that the #1 consumer of tranny porn was straight guys. No judgement.
Isn’t “straight guys” the right answer for #1 consumer of ANY type of porn?
That’s a fair point, but I’m pretty sure that everyone who is criticizing Bernie is still willing to spend hours in line to vote for the guy over Trump.
It was tough for me to vote for Hillary. I took some comfort in knowing that on foreign policy, we pretty much agreed, and despite my issues with her character, I knew she was an intelligent woman and humble enough to know that she could change her mind.
Bernie and I agree on virtually nothing, I’ve seen no evidence that he is particularly smart, and his inflexibility over the years makes me believe he is almost as arrogant as Trump, he is just less visible.
But I’ll still vote for him.
Except for Bloomberg, every Democratic candidate policy positions are reasonably close to Bernies, so it shouldn’t be that hard for Bernie supporters to vote for the Democratic candidate. That would be true even if the Republicans were running a Romney or a McCain. Against Trump, not supporting the Democrat nominee, is just an act of a selfish and immature child.
According to the book pretty much yes, except for written erotica where the top consumers was women. There were some other exception, but I don’t remember them in detail and already derailed the thread, so I’ll stop.
I have to ask, who would be the target market of tranny porn if not the overall consumer of all porn?
Its not like their particular set of features make them particular attractive to gay men or women, or straight men or women.
Nesrie
3068
Well there is the fact that erotica in books is actually made for women, and porn for women is overlooked or even avoided, but women do consume porn.
A) “tranny” is a slur, folks, let’s try to avoid it.
B) read that at a glance as “tyranny porn” and was weirdly intrigued.
Hal9000
3070
B) read that at a glance as “tyranny porn” and was weirdly intrigued
Trump knocks on Adam’s door with an election ballot and skin-tight Daisy dukes. With a sly wink he’s let inside.
CraigM
3071
I legit snorted at that.
Adam, not to kink shame, but I didn’t expect that from you.
Scuzz
3072
But is Sanders a registered Democrat?
I mean, I’m also weirdly intrigued by like gut microbiomes and crystalline growth patterns; doesn’t mean I want to do butt stuff with them.
Timex
3074
Anything with gut microbiomes is inherently butt stuff.