Timex
3941
Whatever Canada, we’ll spell your cities however we damn well please.
one of those slushhole countries
Here in the future, all news outlets are Fox News.
Anyone could miss Canada, all tucked away down there…
Thrag
3945
I prefer the British spelling Ottouaw.
ShivaX
3946
Origin is that people are, rightfully, asking why Maggie Haberman had info about Trump breaking the law, but was saving it for her fucking book for over a year and only released it when the WaPo scooped her. So the response from many journalists is: blame the readers for asking why this happened.
CraigM
3947
Maga Haberman sat on a lead?
Quelle suprise!
ShivaX
3948
It’s truly shocking that the NYTimes would employ people that do shitty things and then lash out when people ask why they are doing them.
Also calling @KevinC
KevinC
3949
Sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, fuck the New York Times.
Goddamn! I remember a time when I could point to an article from the Times and it meant something. “Okay, I wasn’t sure this was for real, but it’s there in the Times”. Now we have clickbait and Maga fuckin’ Haberman sitting on information to peddle books.
Timex
3950
Maggie Habberman, in particular, is trash.
Not sure where to put this
rrmorton
3955
Guess they killed him but the man sure looked good with a cigarette.
Oh no! That is sudden and sad.
I loved how he endorsed Hilary for the 2016 election. ‘Wrong within normal parameters’
belouski
3957
No one looks good with a cigarette.
rrmorton
3958
Oh, please. Of course they do.
Doesn’t mean they should smoke 'em but those damnable things are sexy and cinematic af.
Menzo
3959
I guess we’ll agree to disagree.
Yeah, cigarettes look cool as fuck. They’re awful and probably should be outlawed but goddamn if they don’t make you look 2x as awesome in film.
