Really? The stuff I was reading said Newsmax used to be free to DirectTV but has started to ask for money which is when DirectTV told them to take a hike.
Menzo
4611
I don’t think that’s what I’ve heard. I believe what I’ve heard is that DirectTV was the main income for Newsmax and there has been discussion for quite a while about DirectTV cutting them off because they are terrible.
If this sounds familiar, it’s because DirecTV went through this same thing with OAN almost exactly a year ago. The big difference there was that AT&T (who own DirecTV) was the primary funding behind OAN’s launch in 2013, while Newsmax seems to be financially unconnected to DirecTV.
Menzo
4613
Hmm, yeah, I might be getting them confused, because that tracks.
Because freedom means you’re obligated to fund someone else’s speech.
I always enjoy how much work the word “may” does. It gives you an exquisitely calibrated probability that congressional hearings will happen - in this case, either, they will, or they will not, so it’s clearly a probability of 0.5. He’s saying there’s a pretty good chance!

What is the point of these hearings besides being a dog and pony show? Nevermind Direct TV. When they called in Zuckerberg, for example, and he just stood there and bullshitted for hours, what was the point of that? Everyone knows no laws are going to get passed, no policy is going to change, nothing is gonna happen.
It is largely just their Festivus - airing of grievances, they get to display feats of strength and their followers can feast.
To which TPG Capital and ATT said, so what.
I think the dog and pony show is the point. It produces material they can use for campaign ads. For Republicans, being in office is about campaigning in office, not governing. For Democrats, it is about both campaigning in office and governing.
I’m pretty sure that’s true of 99% of congressional hearings.
Yeah I wasn’t disagreeing, just adding a qualifier as to the scale of the issue with congressional hearings :)
I will say that Congressional Hearing testimony makes for really dramatic moments years later in documentaries. That’s just something I’ve noticed.
And content for fundraising emails. “Click here to donate and join the fight against blah blah blah!”
KevinC
4626
Gee, Media, I wonder why this might be?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/02/06/poll-americans-dont-feel-biden-impact/
Media polls find Americans grossly uniformed, fails to see irony, immediately returns to 24/7 coverage of Chinese spy balloon and classified documents debacle.
Immediately follow by publishing article about balloon “hysteria.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/06/china-balloon-war-hysteria-taiwan/
The whole incident leaves me feeling unsettled and alarmed. Oh, I’m not worried about the spy balloon. The violation of U.S. airspace was unacceptable, but it did not pose any actual threat, and it’s doubtful that it gathered any intelligence that Chinese spy satellites cannot. What concerns me is the hysterical overreaction on the part of so many Americans to the balloon’s progress.
Followed by blaming a lot of responsible parties, but NOT the nonstop media coverage.
You may think the media over-covered the balloon but as for me, I know for sure it was as big as 3 busses…
… actually, it turns out the PAYLOAD was as big as 3 busses, not the balloon itself. But they didn’t bother providing that insignificant clarification.