This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://www.quartertothree.com/fp/2017/01/16/nintendo-presents-gun-fingers-cow-milking-eating-switchs-killer-launch-game/
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at http://www.quartertothree.com/fp/2017/01/16/nintendo-presents-gun-fingers-cow-milking-eating-switchs-killer-launch-game/
Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aime explained to Gamespot why this isn’t a pack-in game. Basically, they wanted to hit the $300 launch price for the console, and bundling a game would’ve made the hardware too expensive. Also, Reggie says 1-2-Switch is a much more expansive game than Wii Sports.
[quote]
“You make the comment about Wii Sports, and certainly, the analogy that it’s a great utilization of the Joy-Con and shows off the capabilities of the system, that is absolutely true,” Fils-Aime said. “I would say, though, that 1, 2, Switch has many more experiences–it’s a wider pallet of experiences, potentially more akin to Wii Play than to Wii Sports. And, again, from that standpoint, Wii Play was a standalone piece of software both with a controller at the time and without, so that’s probably the better analogy.”[/quote]
You can’t stop videogame executives from talking about experiences. You can only hope to contain them.
Oh good, because it looked like a demo disc containing extremely dumb justifications for their controller gimmicks.
In fact, the cow milking game looked so stupid that i thought it was someone who photo shopped a game to make fun of Nintendo.
Did anyone buy Wii Play without a controller.?
Apparently the ‘hd rumble’/haptic feedback/whatever is inside those controllers is the main pull most of the games are showcasing, so maybe it’s slightly more interesting than waggling. Waggling AND wobbling.