Hey Brian, maybe you’re looking at the wrong kind of porn. You know, with the wrong participants. The Greeks in particular thought women useful only for, you know, breeding… otherwise many of them would engage in other mutually-pleasurable activities.
Just a thought.
Hey Brian, maybe you’re looking at the wrong kind of porn. You know, with the wrong participants. The Greeks in particular thought women useful only for, you know, breeding… otherwise many of them would engage in other mutually-pleasurable activities.
Just a thought.
Wow, the dreaded quadruple post. A testament to the sluggish response of QT3 for the better part of a minute. I’m going to keep those up as a monument to the intarweb infrastructure.
The funny thing is it could have been much worse, I was actually testing to see with another browser window if my posts were going through.
And why not just delete the extra 3…
This post and his analysis of “Convoy” have me almost convinced that Koontz isn’t real. “Convoy” was just too campy and obscure of a choice…And if a delusional mad-scientist shut-in like Koontz were a bona fide expert on anything, it would be porn.
Forums don’t permit the deletion of any post but the last post in a thread by a user. So if someone already started replying (which apparently they did), the post can’t be deleted any more.
Well, I think we can all thank our lucky stars for that, because as previously discussed, the only thing Koontz apparently masturbates to are things that don’t get him off. Up is down! Left is right! Yeahrggggggggh…
Could we, like, not talk about Koontz’s mastabatory practices? Please? Christ, I need a lobotomy now.
What little amateur porn I’ve seen is either homemade (non-professional) OR its self-conscious in the same manner as traditional porn, but with even worse actors.
What I’m looking at is high-quality amateur porn that becomes professional, yet retains Realism. Like amateur porn that doesn’t play to the camera, yet uses porn-level directing.
I guess you could call it the Next Step for amateur porn. Or… Real Sex.
The idea is really that its not porn at all… that the viewer is watching regular sex that just happens to be filmed (and filmed well). More voyeurism than porn.
This reminds of a call-in to a Channel 4 programme with James Whale (and perhaps Mariella Fostrup), where a male caller once stated that he thought he could only be attracted to “hermaphrodite females”, and wanted to know where he could find such a woman.
Whale’s response (paraphrased) : “There’s no such thing as a hermaphrodite female. Maybe you’re just gay.”
Brian, maybe you’re gay.
That’s like wanting water without the dihydrogen monoxide.
The idea is really that its not porn at all… that the viewer is watching regular sex that just happens to be filmed (and filmed well). More voyeurism than porn.
There’s a whole world of “gonzo” porn out there that might be exactly what you’re looking for. May I suggest you start here:
Actually, that whole chain is pretty good. they have bignaturals, too, which is good. Just make sure you know what you are paying for.
[quote=“Robert_Sharp”]
Actually, that whole chain is pretty good. they have bignaturals, too, which is good. Just make sure you know what you are paying for.[/quote]
I think you actually get about 10 different sites when you sign up for that one. They’re all part of the same “family”, but not all of them may be your cup of tea.
Oh, and here’s a top tip: after you sign up for one of these sites, click on “cancel my membership” and as an incentive to stay you’ll be offered a 50% discount.*
Wait, there are people that pay for pornography on the Internet?
You have to pay for the good stuff. We are talking quality movies here, not just some pics from a gallery. Those are teasers for the good stuff!
I’ve never been very partial to porn videos. I much prefer porn pics and imagination.
[size=7]YEAH, WE GET IT, BRIAN.[/size] Jesus.
Hey, lay off the Koontzman. He’s the most respected masturbator on this board by far.