Profits drive Prescription Opiate drugs which drive Heroin which drive deaths

Why are we so silent as a nation on what prescribing opiate drugs are doing to this country?

From 1996 to now, prescriptions for Opiates has grown from a $45M business to a $3.1B business by 2010.

Deaths from overdoses in that same timeframe grew from 4,030 to 16,651.

The Shacketts’ story is hardly unique. Prescription opioid use has been on the rise in the U.S. since the late 1990s, and heroin has not been far behind. From 2001 to 2014, the rate of heroin-related fatal overdoses has increased sixfold. A recent CDC report found that more people died from drug overdoses in the U.S. in 2014 than in any other year on record—and over 60 percent of those deaths came from opioids. And as the media coverage, town hall meetings and local legislative hand-wringing over the past 18 months have shown, things are only getting worse. A new heroin scourge has risen out of the ruins of the 2000s opioid craze, and, unlike previous incarnations in the late 1960s and ’70s, it’s no longer confined to the seedy alleyways of the nation’s big cities. This time it’s sweeping through working- and middle-class America. “It’s the guy standing behind you in Starbucks,” Donna Shackett says. “It’s your kid’s teacher. It’s your next-door neighbor.

In my little 2,000 person town that is on the outskirts of Portland, we’ve buried 3 kids between the ages of 20-24 this year for Heroin overdoses or related that were known acquaintances of our children.

Newsweek this past week had a great article summarizing all this pain & suffering, but is also highlighting that it is middle aged americans - both female and male, that are seeing death rates RISE as a result of overdoses.

In November 2015, two Princeton economists, Anne Case and Angus Deaton, published a report analyzing mortality rates among Americans from 1999 to 2013. Their findings violently overturned our fundamental expectations for life expectancy in 21st-century America: For 14 years, the mortality rate among white Americans age 45 to 54 rose, half a percent every year. According to Case and Deaton, if mortality rates had simply held steady at their 1998 number, there would have been 96,000 fewer deaths from 1999 to 2013. Further, if the mortality rates had continued to steadily decline as they had in the second half of the 20th century—and as is typical of industrialized countries—488,500 deaths could have been prevented over that 14-year period. As Deaton told The Washington Post, “Half a million people are dead who should not be dead.”

It’s simple really, doctors get paid huge sums to sell patients pain medication, the patient gets hooked, but can’t afford the prescription drugs, so they turn to Heroin because it’s the same effect at 1/10 the cost.

But hey, at least the big pharma’s are making money right? So who really cares?

Of course, while there is always a place for both triage and more stringent prescriber guidelines, such efforts won’t cut off these drugs at the source. And pharmaceutical companies like Purdue, Endo, Johnson & Johnson and Abbott Labs have little incentive to reduce the sales of their pain pills: They’ve been lavishly profiting from the opioid epidemic for nearly two decades. It’s also too early to tell how the opioid epidemic is affecting the livelihoods of men and women in their 20s and 40s. It may take years for us to fully comprehend the scope of its devastation. And there’s a good chance it’ll get worse before it gets better: In August, the FDA approved the use of OxyContin for children ages 11 to 16.

Are we silent? The rise in deaths among white Americans largely attributed to drug use has been really big news…on my internet, anyway.

Doctors are forbidden from just handing out scripts to new patients. If they do receive opiates - it’s in a hospital setting, or they’re an established patient.

The rise in deaths is probably a mixture of the worsening social and economic plight of middle aged, poor, white Americans and the high street prices for commercial opiates driven by the strict script controls.

Yes, I agree that there has been quite a bit of coverage - but so much is happening at the local level. I stumbled across this site (www.namsdl.org) that lists the status of various laws across the states and it really points to a the need for a national guidance. The laws submitted to congress are swept to committees while states are putting a lot of laws / regulations on the books.

I see news articles here & there, and the occasional presidential hopeful mentioning it, but the attitude among friends / acquaintances is largely one of “thank god it’s not happening in my family” or “they should have known better” when discussing this. I also don’t see the attitude that prescription drugs lead to heroin. Heroin is still the seedier side and I’m afraid it’s going to take a lot more deaths due to heroin before people wake up.

It’s not silent. There are so many laws involving these that you can’t get some of these pain killers from a family physician anymore. You have to pay to see a pain specialists which means people who are taking these for injuries have to pay a lot more just to see a physician who might continue subscribing a medication they’ve been taking for years.

Yeah, now that so many white people are dying of heroin and prescription drug abuse it really is a big political and media deal. I see politicians around here grandstanding all the time for the news about things like handing out naloxone to all police and EMTs and so on.

But despite the avidity with which drug companies sell opioids, and despite their overuse by medical people who find it easier to overprescribe, it must be recognized that there is just no alternative for severe pain relief. A general rollback of opioid prescriptions might cause great harm to people with chronic conditions for whom milder drugs do nothing. Theoretically of course they could just be exempted, but as Nesrie points out every layer of bureaucracy or control somehow winds up costing patients more money.

Yeah, now that so many white people are dying of heroin

You think this is a new thing? I mean, in many specific regions, heroin has been a massive problem for a long time. When I lived in Worcester, there were freaking junkies everywhere.

Dramatic upsurge in recent years. In the 20th century it wasn’t a yuppie sort of drug. Or at least not so much.

See my ninja edit there. While it may have spread to areas where it’s now new, it’s been a major problem in certain cities for ages, and it was definitely not limited to minority communities.

Certainly there have always been white users of all classes. But I don’t know that there were very many rich white young users during the years in which let us say cocaine was the popular party drug. Heroin was only fashionable in counterculture during those years, and prescription drug habits were embarrassing, not cool. But now it seems to be much more mainstream. Perhaps because abuse of ADHD drugs and similar prescription study aids is so popular in school, that afterwards other forms of prescription abuse become more acceptable? Just speculation.

There is a great article over at the Washington Post on the bureaucratic nightmare that the DEA has introduced stymieing efforts to control the flood of prescription opioids.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/the-dea-slowed-enforcement-while-the-opioid-epidemic-grew-out-of-control/2016/10/22/aea2bf8e-7f71-11e6-8d13-d7c704ef9fd9_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

This really makes our government look bad, and by government I mean Obama. This happened on his watch. The DEA gave in to corporate interests. It’s one thing for congress to have these stupid laws that were enacted this year, it’s an entirely different thing if you assign people to positions of power to support what Congress is doing.

That summer, lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry intensified on Capitol Hill. Several members of Congress, led by Reps. Tom Marino (R-Pa.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), were proposing a measure that critics said would undercut the DEA’s ability to hold drug distributors accountable.

Four major players lobbied heavily in favor of the legislation, called the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act. Together, McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal and the distributors’ association, the Healthcare Distribution Alliance, spent $13 million lobbying House and Senate members and their staffs on the legislation and other issues between 2014 and 2016, according a Post analysis of lobbying records.

I just saw that there was some meeting about it with Newt Gingrich and Van Jones of all people involved. I guess there is still some bipartisanship out there in the world.

Also covered by Last Week with John Oliver last night

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pdPrQFjo2o

Just friggin’ legalize marijuana. A large number of people using opiates for pain find that marijuana works better and has far fewer and less severe side effects, especially when administered via a medical marijuana system.Cheaper too.

It’s already going there naturally. We just need it at a federal level to help speed things up. OR has it legal, but it’s still dicey with the federal and employment piece.

The federal prohibition also makes banking issues a nightmare.

You’re right. A building full of drugs and cash isn’t a problem at all…heh. I thought there was at least an attempt to help with the banking situation, but I don’t see how that’s really going to work without federal backing.

The feds just need to de-schedule it, because the status quo is absurd, and makes no sense.

From a purely objective perspective, it’s current schedule makes no sense, because we know that there are in fact established medical uses for the drug. Thus, it can’t be a schedule 1 drug.

Yep. But the opposition to weed has always been cultural. It represents “them,” the people the social conservatives loathe and fear. It encapsulates the entire sixties, the women’s lib movement, the Civil Rights movement, jazz, rock and roll, free love, atheism, and hell, probably everything else they don’t like. Even though hypocrisy reigns supreme (yeah, the people adamantly against weed don’t abuse substances at all, no sirree, no DUIs or nose candy for them, no sir!), it’s a political stance that works with their supporters. And I suspect that it will take some courage for these mainstream pols to finally admit the emperor is not only naked, but parading around with a woody.

Well, it makes sense to local law enforcement. It allows them to use seizure laws to take cars and cash from people. And if they go to trial and are exonerated, they have many flaming hoops to go through to get their property back. Most don’t. Also subsidies to law enforcement to pursue the “War on Drugs.” The pushback, both local and statewide, pretty much means the it will probably not be done on a Federal level.