Proving the negative

I find it ironic that just as Bush forced Saddam to prove he didn’t have WMD’s, now people are forcing Bush to have to prove that Iraq wasn’t on the top of his agenda and the driving force for his policies after 9/11.

He could try to prove he isn’t a Mo-ron. Bad odds, I’d say.

I don’t think folks are forcing Bush to do anything. They’re just calling him on what he did. O’Neill, Clarke and now Woodward.

So until Bush admits it, people can’t raise the point?

The Grand Old Party: purveyors of epistemology since 1992.

Edit: eh?

Teach me about epistemology, Jason.