That’s nice to know, and not at all concerning that you felt compelled to proclaim your innocence in such an obvious manner. It’s like whenever a politician says ‘trust me’, you know you shouldn’t.
1 drink for me, +1 fascist suspicion points for each of Tim and Rowe.
I will allow no morally dubious chancellors my watch.
An obvious fascist ploy would be to disparage anyone claiming a liberal bent! Morally dubious to whom? Your buddy…HITLER?? (Insert Church Lady/Hitler meme)
In these trying times, it is difficult to judge an individuals loyalty, so do I leave the nomination to chance, or should I seek public counsel as to who would be a successful nominee so as to kick off with a formed government!
Also, do I understand correctly that there are no Presidential powers until at least one fascist policy is enacted?
That is correct. Whichever President is in office when a Fascist policy is enacted will need to use the corresponding power; they cannot be saved for later.
Now know it might seem like you don’t have a lot to go on, and you may think that this first choice won’t matter that much. Just one facist policy won’t hurt right? WRONG. I have the advantage of futuristic hindsight, all the way from 2016. I can tell you that this is where it all goes downhill. What could have been a real chance for us was completely squandered by your chancellor choice of someone other than me. Luckily, the resistance was able to send me back in time to give you this message, and now you have a chance to make things right.