It’s actually very different from the others. For one thing, at least until the ending, it’s played very straight and seriously - there aren’t little tin tanks rolling up to fight Godzilla - the government has the weapons that the current japanese military actually has at its disposal.
As Soren stated, it’s largely a Godzilla procedural – what would a modern government do, faced with a natural disaster like Godzilla, and what could they actually legally do: what steps would they have to take to authorize force? what effect would the Japanese constitution’s restrictions on the use of force have? which government bodies have jurisdiction? How can the Japanese invoke its security treaty with the US? At what point does Japan need to get assistance from the UN and/or even hand over responsibility for the response - by getting the support of the world by letting the UN act, is Japan better off because they will help Japan rebuild afterwards in sympathy, or is Japan better off acting alone?
So it’s completely different from prior Godzilla movies, and the only attempt to “realistically” deal with the obstacles and process/procedure of a modern, heavily bureaucratic system of government. And while that, at times, is used for satire/humor, it’s largely played straight – one of the other refreshing, if not unique, aspects of this Godzilla movie is that there are no human villains. Even though some government officials are tedious in their adherence to procedure, they are always clearly trying their best to act for the public good. Same with the military responders. And even the international community is largely played fairly, although there is a little bit of US-bashing (and a completely ridiculous US “representative” character). But there’s no idiotic mayor saying “the beaches must stay open” or evil business man, or reckless military hawks who won’t listen to the scientists, etc.
Also completely different; Godzilla itself. And I say “itself” because Godzilla is really not humanized in any way, or even made into a recognizable type of animal life – it is far more of a seemingly mindless “force of nature” - something that’s been suggested in other movies, but it’s never been as accurate a description as it is in this movie. A lot of what Godzilla does very much resembles recent Japanese disasters - the tsunami and nuclear plant meltdown - in the same way that Cloverfield’s tearing down of buildings in NYC evoked 9/11 imagery. It’s not just a giant, flame-breathing, T-Rex: Godzilla’s creation and backstory (and the implications of what its appearance means) is actually interesting and has some thematic depth.
In the end the story is wrapped up in a less realistic way, but it also pays homage to the original Godzilla movie.
So yeah, this Godzilla move is very much not like the others. It’s slow-paced and largely involves people in meetings, which will bore many people and likely makes it the least kid-friendly Godzilla movie ever. But it’s also one of the most adult and serious movies - in fact, maybe the only movie to take the subject matter seriously since the 1954 Godzilla. As a result, it’s also easily one of the best Godzilla movies, and one of the very few that is legitimately a decent movie, and not just something goofy and perhaps worth a few laughs.
7.4/10