Once it became politicized, same as everything else, it became something for people to treat as sports, my team vs your team. It’s hardly new, except in that it’s happening in the US, at least I’m not aware of previous existence in the up until now pragmatic USA. Look up Lysenkoism or Deutsche Physik.
Because some people have abandoned reality and should ideally be removed from it post-haste for the sake of the rest of us.
For starters, the tweeters posted a couple posts after yours. . .
rowe33
3862
The Gary R’Nel account is just sad. So many unliked and unloved tweets in a row.
People have had weird ideas about military generals since forever. The idea that career officers wouldn’t have political ambition is ridiculous. Once someone makes Colonel in the Army or Captain in the Navy, they become, by necessity, political animals. They must jockey for funding, recognition, and missions to survive. The orders they receive are typically less about direct military action and more about policy and theater strategy.
Teiman
3867
My spies made me read a book from the chief of Germany submarines before the war. Many of his decisions in peace time had great influence in times of war. It cemented in me that idea, thay generals are somewhat politicians because take political decisions, do they want or not, they decide on policies that have large effects.
Take note that this decisions at the time force a type of combat that is illegal, attacking civil ships, the decisions of germany to attack not other countries armies, but other countries economy at war.
I think it’s possible to achieve general or admiral rank without being all that much of a politician, but I agree the job once those ranks are achieved is largely political, depending to some extent on the role. A brigadier running an air force transport wing in Utah is different from a brigadier running a fighter wing in Iraq, or for that matter a brigadier administering logistics paperwork in the Pentagon.
Yes, but in my experience, that’s the difference between being the mayor or city councilman of Kick Falls, IA or Chicago, IL. You’re still a politician, but the budgets and missions are smaller. Your political survival still depends on gathering the right allies, pushing the correct program, and getting the most funding.
I don’t understand exactly what people want, short of going back in time to prevent the election result. Trump has someone who’s sensible on the job, that person is little more than an enabler. Person’s a total ignoramus, is a ignoramus.
I mean, I understand that there are no good answers here, but between having a competent person who by necessity becomes the fig leaf over the administration’s crazy or just a complete incompetent who’s unable to hide the crazy, pick one.
This is how it begins. If these people are imprisoned I expect escalation.
Not to mention that McMaster wasn’t actually able to refuse the job. Of course, if he didn’t want it, he could make his reservations clear to Trump and plead for an out, but technically, if the President ordered him to take the position, he was stuck.
Clay
3873
Right? I mean, if you’re going to be thrown in the slammer for 75 years for protesting, you might as well make sure that you did something worth notice before you go down. What a sad state of affairs this is.
vyshka
3874
It is okay, some Congressman yesterday said God would take care of it
Well, if you believe in a deity who decides on a whim to cover the planet in water thereby initiating a massive extinction event, you logically might conclude that humanity’s survival is much more dependent on whether we please Him than on what we do about carbon emissions.
Nesrie
3876
No. That would suggest that people with religion cannot believe in science or attempts to save the planet. Those two are not mutually exclusive. You’ll find individuals with religion on the let’s save the planet and protect our environment right alongside atheists.
You’ll also find Yankees fans in Boston.
Nesrie
3878
Religious people caring about the environment is not rare.
I didn’t say all religious people think that way. But Mr. Gianforte says we shouldn’t have Social Security because Noah lived to be 600 and worked all the time, and not only was he not laughed out of the state for that scandalously stupid comment, as in a sane world he immediately would be, but he won the election. So that school of thought is definitely out there. However, my comment was also tinged with a dose of bitter irony. Actually, just assume that everything I say that has anything to do with politics since last November has been tinged with a dose of bitter irony.