With Mississippi, we’re now up to 23 states refusing to fully comply with the Kobach commission data request.

So I guess the NRA/Beet woman is mad at people calling her out on the Twitterz.
Of course Ken is more than happy to call her out on free speech.




Jeez. Scroll down a couple of replies in that Twitter thread and you get a GG/Anti-Anita Sarkeesian idiot all up in Ken’s face.

How is GG still a thing?



So, uh.

Because of course they did.

The best Cyber.

Mississippi.

That’s is the greatest thing to come out of Mississippi possibly ever.

Better than the institutional racism?

If it’s like the CrossCheck system, they’d prefer having a smaller amount of information because it leads to more false positives. If they find two people with the same name in different states they can now assume it’s voter fraud.

North Carolina partially complied- they’re not offering anything that isn’t avaliable to members of the public.

Because some people are little more than overgrown excretions. Biological waste that has continued to self replicate, much to the horror of decent human beings.

Their concerns stem from a letter the commission sent to every state this week, asking for full voter rolls and vowing to make the information “available to the public.” The requested information includes full names, addresses, birth dates, political party and, most notably, the last four digits of Social Security numbers. The commission is also seeking data such as voter history, felony convictions and military service records.

Digital security experts say the commission’s request would centralize and lay bare a valuable cache of information that cyber criminals could use for identity theft scams — or that foreign spies could leverage for disinformation schemes.

“It is beyond stupid,” said Nicholas Weaver, a computer science professor at the University of California at Berkeley.

“The bigger the purse, the more effort folks would spend to get at it,” said Joe Hall, chief technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a digital advocacy group. “And in this case, this is such a high-profile and not-so-competent tech operation that we’re likely to see the hacktivists and pranksters take shots at it.”

Indeed, by Friday night, over 20 states — from California to Mississippi to Virginia — had indicated they would not comply with the request, with several citing privacy laws and expressing unease about aggregating voter data.

Not mentioned above: beyond the concerns expressed by the so-called “digital security experts”, simply emailing that data, as recommended by the commission, is arguably an even greater and more immediate concern than the exposed data silos.

What are the practical consequences of our proposal? The astute reader will no doubt ask whether this proposal means that those who are not wealthy will sicken and perish from treatable diseases. The answer is clearly, yes. And yet much will depend on the choices that our fellow citizens make.

We expect that even less affluent Americans will choose to treat potentially life-threatening bacterial infections with antibiotics, a highly effective and generally affordable remedy. When it comes to more expensive treatments – such as dialysis for those suffering from kidney failure – many families will no doubt conclude that the cost is simply too great and exceeds the anticipated benefit. A perfectly rational choice in our minds.

Our modest proposal also has the advantage of creating exactly the right incentives to stimulate our citizens and our economy – that is, to make America truly great again.

(2/17): Whoever made the tweet’s video is just some childish cultist. Fine. But for the most powerful man in the world to send it out is nuts. /2

(3/17): Forget, for the moment, whether Trump was serious about physically attacking CNN. The larger issue is his state of mind. /3

(4/17): This is a 71 year old man, supposedly Leader of the Free World and our Commander in Chief, occupying his time like a teenage shitposter. /4

(5/17): On a Sunday morning before our most important American national holiday, this is what he thinks is worth his time. It obsesses him. /5

(6/17): He does not understand his own legislative initiatives. He has no interest in foreign affairs. But he has time to tweet dumb videos. /6

(7/17): He does not wake up terrified every day that he does not understand the immense realities of his job. (The rest of us do.) /7

(8/17): Instead, his first impulse - and we know this because we can track his schedule and movements with Twitter - is to attack media enemies. /8

(9/17): Trump’s supporters should be horrified that all they hoped for from him is a lie. Instead, they’re as smug as the media they criticize. /9

(10/17): Gone are the “we’ll keep him accountable” assurances. Now it’s “CNN and Joe and Mika are babies.” As if this is an excuse. /10

(11/17): Others merely ask for Trump to stop tweeting, as if not seeing his tweets will reassure them that he’s regained his emotional balance. /11

(12/17): The cult are is beyond the reach of rational criticism. They’re the Obama cult on steroids, the Clinton cult set to “thermonuclear.” /12

(13/17): But the conservatives who claimed to be concerned but vigilant now have to step forward and just own this. Own it or repudiate it. /13

(14/17): No more “concern,” no more “he’s not a politician,” no more “he’s authentic.” None of that works, except for the rubes and angry hicks. /14

(15/17): If you embrace this, just admit that you don’t give a damn about American health, security, or anything else. Just your resentment. /15

(16/17): If now all you care about is making CNN and the NYT mad, say so. That’ll save us all time not having to pretend you care about policy. /16

(17/17): But as the GOP - and America - melts down in a flaming dumpster, don’t blame the media or elites or anyone else.
You are the enablers. /17x

I wonder if Tom knows you can embed links into a tweet - maybe to a blog page or something where you can write more than 140 characters at a time.

Beats me. Don’t read him that often. Do people still have blogs? That’s like, so 2010.

The Institute of Voter Protection would be a fine Orwellian name.

I do! Not that I update them much.