Clay
4866
I blame Bannon for this thread going to shit. Why don’t you all create a different thread for your gold farming arguments.
I think they are finished.
ShivaX
4868
I’m not sure where Mensch’s insanity belongs, but the downfall of America seems right.
Timex
4871
15000? That doesn’t sound right.
Nesrie
4872
Timex
4873
From your source:
Researchers from RAND used much lower numbers to estimate transgender-related health-care costs, putting the total ranks of active transgender service members between 1,300 and 6,600 and concluding that only about 130 might seek gender-related surgeries.
That’s the number I had heard, as it is the study which pointed out the very small cost of any potential medical procedures for them.
Wikipedia’s Transgender people and military service > United States appears to be pretty well sourced. (15 sources).
It was estimated that in 2008-2009 there were approximately 15,500 transgender individuals either serving on active duty or in the National Guard or Army Reserve forces within the U.S. Military.[38] A 2016 study, however, based on previous research estimated that only between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender individuals served on active duty and between 830 and 4,160 in reserve duty, with midrange figures of 2,450 in active duty and 1,510 in reserves. [39][40]
Nesrie
4875
Sure but I meant this paragraphs:
A 2014 study estimated that 15,500 trans people were currently serving in the U.S. military. The Williams Institute, a think tank at UCLA School of Law that researches gender identity, came to that figure using a 2011 survey of 6,546 transgender Americans. Around 20 percent of that survey’s respondents said they had served in the armed forces. There are currently 1.3 million active-duty personnel in the U.S. military and an additional 800,000 in reserves.
I get the impression they’re not all self identified.
RichVR
4876
Oh shit! Climbs under table cradling mug of ale.
rowe33
4878
Reminds me of a propaganda video from a game, like Command & Conquer.
Otagan
4879
More than you might expect.
Nesrie
4881
Clearly taken from the book of Job where Jesus said screw all poor people, who could not possibly be righteous, and rely on the rich to be devote and generous.
It’s somewhat consistent with Calvinism though, is it not?
ShivaX
4883
Not really from what I know of Calvinism, which is heavy on predestination iirc.
Which would lean towards those people are poor because God wants them to be or the like.
Also Jesus is the Word Incarnate, so going against what he said is probably a sure-fire way into hell. Which you were going to anyway because God knew you were when He made you, because predestination.
Edit: There is a hint of the whole, “God made them poor, so fixing that is thwarting God’s will,” in some strains of Calvinism, but that runs into one massive roadblock: God is perfect and all-knowing so if you raise the poor out of poverty, it was His will in the first place.
Then again, a lot of theology is stupid as hell.
Long read on Politico about how pulling out of TPP screws over US agriculture - and US agricultural regions of course heavily supported Trump.
What goes unmentioned in this is Trump’s failure to do anything on this front in the aftermath of pulling out. Remember how he was the best negotiator? How he would get the US the best deals? Hasn’t happened. He hasn’t even tried.
But the rest of the world hasn’t been so lazy:
The 11 other countries that participated in TPP are involved in 27 separate trade negotiations with each other and with other major trading powers in the region like China and massive blocs like the EU. The efforts range from exploratory conversations to deals already signed and awaiting ratification. Seven of the deals have been concluded or launched in the five months since the United States withdrew from TPP.