Among the pundit class, you also have George Will and Joe Scarborough.
A poll from May puts the number of young GOP voters ditching the party at 250,000
Plus there has been fair amount of analysis on 538 showing a shrinking GOP. If you were hesitant about Trump before the election, and didn’t vote for him or only vote for him as anti-Hillary, I think it is just as easy to disassociate with the Republican as it is just to declare your opposition to Trump.
I’ve always lived in heavily Democratic places and voted for many Democrats. Over the last 3 cycle, I voted for one more Republican than Democrat totally. So I don’t know if this will change my voting much. What it does change is my campaign contributions, zero dollars to Republican candidates as long as Trumpites are in charge.
Scuzz
5874
I can see young voters leaving Trump, but I no longer have a lot of faith in polling numbers, strange what a terrible job with one political election will do to your trust. 538 was real close with their figures there.
Also, do the young vote? I know someone above joked about that but I think that is a real concern.
I had forgotten about Will, but it’s not like George Will is going to vote/donate to the Dems.
I think when you take Trump out of the picture many of the so-called defections will gravitate back to the GOP.
Silver was the only one I recall saying Trump had a decent chance of winning. And people laughed at him for it.
Scuzz
5876
I thought he had Hillary winning from day one to the end. But I have tried forget everything connected to that evil day in November.
Iirc he had Trump at around 30% leading up to the election. But I don’t blame you for wanting to forget that.
nKoan
5878
Yeah, he was the only (major) forecaster that had Trump higher than like a 5% chance.
antlers
5879
The swing-o-matic which I think is on the 538 site showed all along that a tiny change in white/minority turnout ratio would flip the key industrial states, and that is exactly what happened.
Timex
5881
Nice.
So instead of training those people to do jobs that will actually exist, and wont’ suck, they’re being used as cheap labor while learning a job that is essentially guaranteed to be gone to automation in the near future.
They gulped down the Trump Kool-Aid. Coal is coming back!
rowe33
5883
They swallowed Trump’s crusty yellowed load like true believers. Well done, Fox and Friends. Well done.
Miramon
5885
Part of that is what’s driving a lot of other news problems in recent years. If you reject the facts, you stand a chance of altering them. So acknowledging that Trump was doing surprisingly well prior to the general election was not on for left-leaning organizations that didn’t want him to win.
Let’s say their private analysis said Trump-Clinton was too close to call or even had Trump leading. With any evidence on the other side to cite, the DNC would naturally claim they were ahead in a dominant way, to dishearten GOP voters. The possibility this strategy would bite them in the ass due to lots of voters disliking HRC almost as much as Trump and staying home as a result perhaps didn’t occur to them.
If you’ve driven through the western part of our State, you’ve probably seen the MAKE COAL GREAT AGAIN billboards on businesses and even an eighteen wheeler trailer alongside the major highways. Trump made those people believe that coal is on the rise. When my son was at West Virginia University, I saw it the whole ride from west of Harrisburg, PA and Hagerstown, MD.
Timex
5887
Oh yeah, in central PA it’s a thing to be sure.
None
5888
How forgetful and sheltered those 59% must be.
No doubt, I’m on record in a number of posts having blamed the media for imbalanced coverage. Maybe I’m wrong, but I feel like it’s reasonable that if media coverage had taken him seriously as a candidate and more people had accepted the idea that he had a reasonable shot at winning instead of thinking his candidacy was a complete joke, then maybe more people would have gone out to vote and maybe there would have been fewer “not Hillary” votes.
The irony of the coal states is that around the same time they finally realize Trump is not bringing coal back because coal is never coming back, he and Congress will have already cut the funding for all those empty retraining programs, and they’ll be left with no jobs and no training.
It kills me to read that these folks have their pick of dozens of career re-training options free of charge, and they’d rather choose to go back to work in the mines for $13 an hour (contract worker) when they used to make $30 (union worker). You can make $13 an hour doing a hell of a lot less dangerous jobs than coal mining, and you can often make more than $30 an hour in careers offered by the retraining such as electrician, nurse and natural gas pipeline construction. These folks don’t just VOTE against their own interests, they actively LIVE against their own interests. How do you change a mentality like that?
Nesrie
5892
They’re scared. They won’t ever admit it, but the same thing happened here decades ago with timber. There were so many that just waited around for logging and mils to come back, and it never did. When you talk to some of them, it was like defeat, a belief they couldn’t possibly do anything else, or they’d have to leave area. That second part is possibility, but the former, the complete lack of confidence and hope that they could succeed with something else.
We don’t much value in emotions and mental health that would come with the loss of an industry someone thought they would spend their entire life at. I grew up knowing I would change careers a few times and hoping I would have what I needed to be able to do that.